Request for permission to backport fixes to jfx-11

Kevin Rushforth kevin.rushforth at oracle.com
Mon Oct 21 21:15:31 UTC 2019


 > JDK-8193502

Johan can comment on whether he wants to backport it. As noted below, 
someone reported a regression associated with it when using gtk2, but we 
don't have a bug filed or a test case.

 > It might have been solved in the fix for JDK-8179073.

Not sure what you mean since JDK-8179073 is still an open bug and thus 
is not a solved issue (although it might be worth re-testing after the 
fix for JDK-8179073).

-- Kevin


On 10/21/2019 1:08 PM, Sverre Moe wrote:
> Could JavaFX 11 also get backported the fix related for JDK-8193502? 
> It might have been solved in the fix for JDK-8179073.
>
> I noticed this regression right after JDK 9 build 161. Recently also 
> JavaFX 8 got this regression after update 181.
>
> It seems this was fixed in JavaFX 13.
> I asked on GitHub in #222 a while back if this could be backported. 
> Considering that repository is now closed, I will repeat it here.
>
> Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> > That's a good question for @johanvos -- it seems this might be a 
> good candidate for backport, although there is one report of a 
> possible regression caused by this fix when using GTK 2 as reported in 
> #475
>
> /Sverre
>
> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193502
> [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8179073
> [3] https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/pull/456
> [4] https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/issues/222
>
> man. 21. okt. 2019 kl. 14:39 skrev Kevin Rushforth 
> <kevin.rushforth at oracle.com <mailto:kevin.rushforth at oracle.com>>:
>
>     +1
>
>     -- Kevin
>
>     On 10/21/2019 3:16 AM, Johan Vos wrote:
>     > Hi Kevin,
>     >
>     > I request permission to backport the following issues to the jfx-11
>     > repository. All patches apply clean or with minor changes (e.g.
>     > build.properties must keep jfx.release.major.version to 11)
>     >
>     > Thanks,
>     >
>     > - Johan
>     >
>     > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8221302 : Upgrade to
>     gcc 8.2 on
>     > Linux
>     > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8221299 : Upgrade to
>     Visual Studio
>     > 2017 version 15.9.6
>     > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8221300 : Upgrade to
>     Xcode 10.1
>     > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8214716 : Record the
>     versions of
>     > tools used to build FX in the repo
>     > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8222788 : javafx.web
>     build fails
>     > on XCode 10.2
>     > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8225203 : Update SQLite
>     to version
>     > 3.28.0
>     > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8219362 : Update to
>     608.1 version
>     > of WebKit
>     > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227079 : Cherry pick
>     GTK WebKit
>     > 2.24.3 changes
>     > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8230361 : [web] Cookies
>     are not
>     > enabled in WebKit v608.1
>     > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8229328 : [windows]
>     > PlatformFileHandle type should be JGObject rather than void *
>     > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227431 : [Windows] Fix
>     assertion
>     > failure on X86 32-bit when enabling CLOOP based JavaScript
>     interpreter
>     > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8222912 : Websocket
>     client doesn't
>     > work in WebView
>     > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8226537 : Multi-level
>     > Stage::initOwner can crash gnome-shell or X.org server
>     > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8212060 : [GTK3] Stage
>     sometimes
>     > shown at top-left before moving to correct position
>     > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8211302 : DragAndDrop
>     no longer
>     > works with GTK3
>     > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213510 : MediaPlayer
>     does not
>     > play some mp3 with artwork stream in mjpeg
>     > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8207942: Add new protected
>     > VirtualFlow methods for subclassing
>



More information about the openjfx-dev mailing list