RFR: 8240692: Cleanup of the javafx property objects

[Tom Schindl]

On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 00:22:59 GMT, Nir Lisker <nlisker at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> I can somehow remember asking Richard Bair why JavaFX internally does not use Simple* but creates the anonymous subclasses and he said it's memory reason - Simple* uses more memory because of the additional fields
>
> That doesn't seem right. The additional fields are captured in the
> anonymous class anyway (same as in lambdas).
> 
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 1:53 AM Tom Schindl <notifications at github.com> wrote:
> 
>> I can somehow remember asking Richard Bair why JavaFX internally does not
>> use Simple* but creates the anonymous subclasses and he said it's memory
>> reason - Simple* uses more memory because of the additional fields
>>
>> —
>> You are receiving this because you were assigned.
>> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
>> <https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/141?email_source=notifications&email_token=AI5QOM5SILAYZUP3TZVCIW3RGGEHTA5CNFSM4LDJHCF2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEODG4OY#issuecomment-596012603>,
>> or unsubscribe
>> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AI5QOM2UNAZKYJUMYJSER7TRGGEHTANCNFSM4LDJHCFQ>
>> .
>>

the subclass saves the owner field who is a static null, not?

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/141