Enhancements for JavaFX 18

[Thiago Milczarek Sayão]

Hi Johan,

Would you prefer a pure Wayland backend or support it with gdk/GTK on top
of the current glass backend?

Cheers

Em ter, 10 de ago de 2021 07:52, Johan Vos <johan.vos at gluonhq.com> escreveu:

> I think we (everyone committing/reviewing in openjdk/jfx) did a great job
> with the 17-work: an impressive amount of old and annoying bugs are fixed.
> For 18 and beyond, I believe we have to keep working on those old issues --
> at least if they are still relevant.
> Also, I am 100% ok with the list of issues Kevin mentioned that need to be
> moved forward now.
>
> Apart from that, I want to have support for Metal and Wayland in JavaFX 18.
>
> - Johan
>
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 2:58 PM Kevin Rushforth <
> kevin.rushforth at oracle.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Now that JavaFX 17 is in RDP2, we can turn more attention to bug fixes
> > and enhancement requests for JavaFX 18. It's the summer, so there may be
> > delays as some people are out at various times (including me), but I
> > would like to get some of the outstanding enhancement requests moving
> > over the next few weeks.
> >
> > Specifically, I'd like to see the following proceed:
> >
> > * Transparent backgrounds in WebView
> > JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8090547
> > PR: https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/563
> >
> > * Add DirectionalLight
> > JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8234921
> > PR: https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/548
> >
> > * CSS pseudoclasses :focus-visible and :focus-within
> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8268225
> > PR: https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/475
> >
> > * Improve property system to facilitate correct usage (minus the binary
> > incompatible API change)
> > JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8268642
> > PR: https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/590 (Draft)
> >
> > And maybe the following:
> >
> > * Add CSS themes as a first-class concept (need a consensus on how to
> > proceed)
> >
> > * Undecorated interactive stage style (still in early discussion, but
> > the concept looks interesting and useful)
> >
> > There are probably others I'm forgetting.
> >
> > Each of the above should be discussed in their own thread on openjfx-dev
> > rather than a reply to this thread.
> >
> > -- Kevin
> >
> >
> >
>