RFR: 8231644: TreeTableView Regression: Indentation wrong using Label as column content type
Marius Hanl
mhanl at openjdk.java.net
Thu Jul 8 21:26:53 UTC 2021
On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 23:57:31 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <kcr at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This PR fixes a long standing issue with the TreeTableView indentation.
>>
>> 
>>
>> In short:
>> **TreeTableCellSkin** overrides **leftLabelPadding()** to calculate the indentation (the result of this method is added to **x**).
>> While this is fine, this method is not always called (by **LabeledSkinBase#layoutLabelInArea**), e.g. when no text is set.
>> So when a TreeTableCell only sets a graphic (e.g. via **setGraphic()** in **updateItem()**), the indentation will be messed up.
>>
>> Fixed this by adding the calculated indentation to **x** before we call **layoutChildren()**.
>>
>> -> We basically add the indentation to **x** when we call **layoutChildren()** instead of letting **layoutLabelInArea()** do it sometimes via **leftLabelPadding()**. (which is called directly by **layoutChildren()**)
>>
>> Note: I also added some tests which pass before and pass after.
>
> modules/javafx.controls/src/main/java/javafx/scene/control/skin/TreeTableCellSkin.java line 107:
>
>> 105:
>> 106: @Override
>> 107: protected void layoutChildren(double x, double y, double w, double h) {
>
> This isn't a review, but just a question and a comment.
>
> Are there any other callers of `leftLabelPadding` that could be affected by the removal of the override?
>
> Btw, you should add `/** {@inheritDoc} */` to the overridden `layoutChildren` method, since it is public API.
good point. I didn't saw any difference but now had a deeper look. Looks like there can be cirumstances, where overriding `layoutChildren ` is not enough.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/568
More information about the openjfx-dev
mailing list