[jfx16] RFR: 8262460: Create release notes for JavaFX 16 [v2]
Kevin Rushforth
kcr at openjdk.java.net
Wed Mar 3 14:44:38 UTC 2021
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:12:40 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <kcr at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> For the last couple releases, I generated the list of bugs to add to release notes, and yes, I typically exclude backports for that reason (it isn't perfect, but it also excludes the issues labeled with the `hgupdate-sync` label, which can be added to indicate an issue synced in from a prior release).
>>
>> Here is the same filter I used in the past, updated for JavaFX 16 for comparison:
>>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/issues/?filter=40381
>>
>> You'll notice that it excludes test bugs and build issue (so the "GitHub Actions" bugs don't show up, for example)
>
> Below is the release note for the warning, taken from [this release note sub-task](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8262948):
>
> ---
>
> ### JavaFX runtime logs a warning if javafx.* modules are loaded from the classpath
>
> The JavaFX classes must be loaded from a set of named `javafx.*` modules on the _module path_. Loading the JavaFX classes from the classpath is not supported. The JavaFX runtime logs a warning at startup if the JavaFX classes are not loaded from the expected named module. See [JDK-8256362](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8256362) for more information.
I also missed noticing that the following bug is marked with the need for a release note:
[JDK-8196079](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8196079): Remove obsolete Pisces rasterizer
I'll create one shortly and add a comment to this PR when done.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/414
More information about the openjfx-dev
mailing list