Question about fatal JavaFX crashes
Philip Race
philip.race at oracle.com
Fri Mar 18 17:55:00 UTC 2022
I have at least seen JIT compiler crashes like this in other unrelated
cases ..
in theory you can use an option like
-XX:CompileCommand=exclude,javafx/scene/control/TableView$5::onChanged
although I am very unsure about the syntax for the last part of it
especially with what looks like
some anonymous method or lambda expression. I can almost guarantee that
my example is wrong.
Excluding the whole of TableView might be easier to specify but will
slow you down a lot.
-phil.
On 3/18/22 10:37 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Thanks, Phil. That was my take as well. I don't see how this can be a
> JavaFX bug given where it is crashing. FWIW, I haven't ever seen
> anything like this.
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
> On 3/18/2022 10:25 AM, Philip Race wrote:
>> I think it is probable that this is a hotspot VM problem in the C2
>> JIT compiler code.
>>
>> I've moved your bug report to hotspot :
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8283386
>> The interesting question isn't about which version of FX used to work.
>> It is what was the last working version of the JDK.
>> It looks a bit like a JDK 17 bug from the evidence so far so if
>> you were running FX 17 on JDK 17 GA you maybe have picked up a later
>> update release of JDK 17 along with FX 18 ??
>>
>> Regardless this doesn't look like an FX bug.
>> But unless you can actually provide a test case, or, by luck the
>> hotspot folks recognise the issue,
>> I don't know what can/will happen.
>>
>> -phil.
>>
>> On 3/18/22 7:08 AM, Daniel Peintner wrote:
>>> Hi John, all,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your detailed reply.
>>> I submitted a bug report with detailed information.
>>>
>>> - Run a different Java version
>>> I tried different versions and vendors with the same result.
>>> * OpenJDK 17.0.1
>>> * Zulu 17.0.2
>>> * I wanted to check also JDK18-ea but gradle does not yet support it
>>>
>>>
>>>> - Try switching to a different GC
>>>> - Use different VM options (are you using anything special?)
>>>> - Anything else that is not often used, non-standard or experimental,
>>>> try going to a more common setup
>>>>
>>> I use no specific setting, all is default.
>>> I have been reading that the -client flag might help in some cases but
>>> unfortunately this flag is no longer taken into account for 64bit JVMS.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> -- Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> --John
>>>>
>>>> On 18/03/2022 09:43, Daniel Peintner wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I take the liberty to ask on the email reflector if there are other
>>>> people
>>>>> with similar problems.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since updating my application to JavaFX18 I get random fatal crashes.
>>>>> Unfortunately it is not predictable but after some time the app
>>>>> crashes
>>>>> with "EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION".
>>>>>
>>>>> The hs_error_pidX reports the following.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --------------- T H R E A D ---------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Current thread (0x0000016be9c9b410): JavaThread "C2 CompilerThread0"
>>>>> daemon [_thread_in_native, id=3068,
>>>>> stack(0x000000393e800000,0x000000393e900000)]
>>>>>
>>>>> Current CompileTask:
>>>>> C2:10515286 18185 4
>>>> javafx.scene.control.TableView$5::onChanged
>>>>> (1049 bytes)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am I the only one seeing this?
>>>>> I am not sure if this relates to changing JavaFX 17 to 18 or
>>>>> whether it
>>>>> makes it just more likely.
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems to be related to
>>>>> "javafx.scene.control.TableView$5::onChanged"
>>>>> since all crashes show this line.
>>>>>
>>>>> Having said that, I cannot provide a test-case since it happens
>>>>> all of a
>>>>> sudden and sometimes after hours using the application.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am open to any feedback or input on how to proceed best.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Daniel
>>
>
More information about the openjfx-dev
mailing list