RFR: JDK-8297412: Remove easy warnings in javafx.fxml, javafx.media, javafx.swing, javafx.swt and javafx.web [v5]
Nir Lisker
nlisker at openjdk.org
Wed Nov 30 00:09:27 UTC 2022
On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 17:04:17 GMT, John Hendrikx <jhendrikx at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> - Remove unsupported/unnecessary SuppressWarning annotations
>> - Remove reduntant type specifications (use diamond operator)
>> - Remove unused or duplicate imports
>> - Remove unnecessary casts (type is already correct type or can be autoboxed)
>> - Remove unnecessary semi-colons (at end of class definitions, or just repeated ones)
>> - Remove redundant super interfaces (interface that is already inherited)
>> - Remove unused type parameters
>> - Remove declared checked exceptions that are never thrown
>> - Add missing `@Override` annotations
>
> John Hendrikx has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Revert change of private class to abstract in FXMLLoader
>
> Exception is now documented instead
An abstract comment about the "warning removals" PRs.
As I go over the code in various places to look at suspicious changes, I find some rather peculiar pieces of code. In this PR it was the non-abstract empty implementations, in the other PRs it's various other things. While I don't suggest to start rewriting code that has been working for years, I find it interesting to see how paradigms have changed since 2014 or before and how there are more expressive ways to write the same code today.
I toyed a bit with some code segments and rewrote them locally just to see what it would look like, and I was happy with the results (didn't save any of the changes since I don't plan to commit them). Just food for thought about how dealing with these warnings can reveal not only immediate bugs, but also sketchy code that makes you raise an eyebrow.
-------------
Marked as reviewed by nlisker (Reviewer).
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/958
More information about the openjfx-dev
mailing list