Does OpenJFX 19.0.2 fix the crash on macOS?

Kevin Rushforth kevin.rushforth at oracle.com
Thu Jan 19 12:43:37 UTC 2023


+1

On 1/19/2023 1:46 AM, Johan Vos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If the JDK installed by Homebrew (is there a public build recipe that 
> Homebrew is using?) in combination with JavaFX causes apps to crash, 
> then the situation is really bad indeed.
> Kevin and myself will work on the administration to have a 19.0.2.1 
> patch update.
>
> - Johan
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 9:11 PM Glavo <zjx001202 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     I just tried to test on my M1 Mac Mini, and successfully
>     reproduced the problem.
>     OpenJDK 11/17/19 installed through Homebrew will cause this problem.
>     For users who use OpenJDK 11, they cannot easily upgrade to
>     OpenJFX 20.
>
>     On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 2:57 AM Johan Vos <johan.vos at gluonhq.com>
>     wrote:
>
>         Hi,
>
>         I'm trying to understand the severity of this. If I understand
>         it correctly, the issue (which is really a bug, no question
>         about that) only occurs when running with a JDK that is built
>         with XCode 14.1 (and MacOS SDK 13).
>
>         Is that correct? If so, are there JDK builds out there that
>         are built with XCode 14.1? From the docs/building.md file in
>         openjdk, I believe the daily builds (by Oracle) are done using
>         Xcode 10.1. I don't know what Oracle and others are using in
>         their JDK releases, but I would be surprised if all of them
>         are building with XCode 14.1?
>
>         Do you control which JDK is used, or is it up to your users to
>         pick a JDK and then use that one? If users are using a really
>         recent version of the JDK (built with Xcode 14.1) it seems to
>         me they can also easily use a really recent version of JavaFX
>         (20-ea)?
>
>         I am probably missing something, so it would be good to get a
>         better understanding of the context?
>         I totally agree that we have to make it as easy as possible
>         for end-users to run JavaFX applications, so we should
>         consider whatever is required to achieve this.
>
>         Thanks,
>
>         - Johan
>
>
>         On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 5:04 PM Glavo <zjx001202 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>             After looking forward to it for a month, I was happy to
>             see the release of OpenJFX 19.0.2, but I was surprised to
>             find that the update log did not contain JDK-8296654.
>
>             I want to know whether this problem has been solved in
>             OpenJFX 19.0.2?
>             I think this is a very serious problem that needs to be
>             repaired urgently.
>             OpenJFX 20 will not be released until a few months later,
>             and it is no longer compatible with JDK 11, so we cannot
>             wait until that time to update it.
>             If 19.0.2 does not include the fix of JDK-8296654, can I
>             ask you to release 19.0.2.1?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/openjfx-dev/attachments/20230119/dc18b115/attachment.htm>


More information about the openjfx-dev mailing list