RFR: 8318841: macOS: Memory leak with MenuItem when Menu.useSystemMenuBar(true) is used [v4]
Kevin Rushforth
kcr at openjdk.org
Wed Nov 8 19:01:13 UTC 2023
On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 19:22:26 GMT, Johan Vos <jvos at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> When the Java layer removes a systemmenu, release the native resources related to this systemmenu.
>> This removes the strong JNI Global ref, which prevents its references from being gc'ed.
>>
>> The current implementation for the mac-specific system menu creates a menu, but never releases its resources. In the `dealloc` of this menu, the strong jni refs are deleted.
>> With this PR, we now release the native resources associated with a menuItem when that one is removed from a menu. A consequence is that this menuItem should never be used after being removed from its current menu (e.g. it should not be re-added, or its text/shortcut should not be altered).
>> The current implementation will create a new MacMenuDelegate every time a menuItem is inserted into a menu, so there should be no references to the native resources lingering.
>
> Johan Vos has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Add a system test
The updated fix looks good. The test passes with the fix and hangs indefinitely without the fix. I left a comment about the fix for the hang and a couple other comments as well.
tests/system/src/test/java/test/javafx/stage/SystemMenuBarTest.java line 122:
> 120: Thread.currentThread().setUncaughtExceptionHandler((t,e) -> {
> 121: e.printStackTrace();
> 122: failed.set(true);
To avoid the test hanging indefinitely, I recommend adding the following after setting the `failed` flag:
memoryLatch.countDown();
tests/system/src/test/java/test/javafx/stage/SystemMenuBarTest.java line 145:
> 143: stage.show();
> 144: stage.requestFocus();
> 145: Thread t = new Thread(){
Question: Since you do all the work in a `Platform.runLater`, is this thread needed?
tests/system/src/test/java/test/javafx/stage/SystemMenuBarTest.java line 163:
> 161: Platform.runLater( () -> {
> 162: System.gc();
> 163: uncollectedMenuItems.removeIf(ref -> ref.get() == null);
This assumes that the references will all be collected by a single call to `System.gc` with no delay. While it worked on my system, it might be fragile. Have you considered using JMemoryBuddy? Or if that isn't suitable for some reason, maybe consider looping a few times with a sleep in between each call to gc?
tests/system/src/test/java/test/javafx/stage/SystemMenuBarTest.java line 165:
> 163: uncollectedMenuItems.removeIf(ref -> ref.get() == null);
> 164: assertEquals(1, uncollectedMenuItems.size(), "Only the last menuItem should be alive");
> 165: memoryLatch.countDown();
If there is a failure, this statement will be unreached. This is why I recommended also doing a countDown on this latch in the `UncaughtExceptionHandler`
-------------
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1277#pullrequestreview-1721015874
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1277#discussion_r1387038813
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1277#discussion_r1387067229
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1277#discussion_r1387069616
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1277#discussion_r1387070763
More information about the openjfx-dev
mailing list