RFR: 8185831: Pseudo selectors do not appear to work in Node.lookupAll() [v6]

Sai Pradeep Dandem duke at openjdk.org
Fri Oct 20 00:26:09 UTC 2023


On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:20:09 GMT, Andy Goryachev <angorya at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Thanks for the clarification. Now I got the point what you are saying about.
>> Added a new test case to cover this scenario. Used x, y.. naming to make a clear separation from previous scenarios.
>> 
>> However do you still prefer to keep the lookupPseudoTest2() scenarios? This is almost similar to quickTest() and lookupAllTest() except that all the nodes used in this method have pseudo classes set.
>
> we could keep it - the more the merrier.
> 
> ideally, we could use a more thorough approach: let's say, use two or three layers, and create as many nodes as there are combinations, to test every combination of the selector and search result.
> 
> but the main result we got is that there should be no regression w.r.t. the old implementation (I think).
> two more people should definitely take a look at this PR still.

Ok. Thank you :)

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1245#discussion_r1366274960


More information about the openjfx-dev mailing list