RFR: 8316135: Create release notes for JavaFX 21 [v3]
Abhinay Agarwal
duke at openjdk.org
Wed Sep 13 12:24:54 UTC 2023
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 12:04:28 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <kcr at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> We should _always_ use the base bug ID and _never_ the backport ID, which for this bug is [JDK-8313227](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313227).
>>
>> I will look into adjusting the JBS filter to make this a less error-prone process (using the `masterbug` macro which will provide the base bug IDs for a given set of backports).
>
>> We should always use the base bug ID and never the backport ID, which for this bug is [JDK-8313227](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313227).
>
> And to be clear I meant that the "base bug ID" for this bug is [JDK-8313227](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313227).
my bad, the release notes has the correct base bug id 👍
my local jfx21 release notes skipped [JDK-8313227](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313227) as it was labelled as `hgupdate-sync`.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1239#discussion_r1324428532
More information about the openjfx-dev
mailing list