RFR: 8311895: CSS Transitions [v19]
Nir Lisker
nlisker at openjdk.org
Sat May 25 23:22:11 UTC 2024
On Sat, 25 May 2024 21:39:24 GMT, Michael Strauß <mstrauss at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Implementation of [CSS Transitions](https://gist.github.com/mstr2/c72f8c9faa87de14926978f517a6018a).
>>
>> ### Future enhancements
>> CSS transitions requires all participating objects to implement the `Interpolatable` interface. For example, targeting `-fx-background-color` only works if all background-related objects are interpolatable: `Color`, `BackgroundFill`, and `Background`.
>>
>> In a follow-up PR, the following types will implement the `Interpolatable` interface:
>> `LinearGradient`, `RadialGradient`, `Stop`, `Background`, `BackgroundFill`, `BackgroundImage`, `BackgroundPosition`, `BackgroundSize`, `BackgroundStroke`, `BorderWidths`, `CornerRadii`, `Insets`.
>>
>> ### Limitations
>> This implementation supports both shorthand and longhand notations for the `transition` property. However, due to limitations of JavaFX CSS, mixing both notations doesn't work:
>>
>> .button {
>> transition: -fx-background-color 1s;
>> transition-easing-function: linear;
>> }
>>
>> This issue should be addressed in a follow-up enhancement.
>
> Michael Strauß has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> added documentation
modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/docs/javafx/scene/doc-files/cssref.html line 749:
> 747: <li>The property value is set programmatically</li>
> 748: <li>The property is bound</li>
> 749: <li>The node becomes invisible</li>
I would mention that this relates to the `visible` property and not to the `opacity` one (the node is invisible if opacity is 0).
Other than that, looks good.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/870#discussion_r1614945779
More information about the openjfx-dev
mailing list