RFR: 8343196: Add build property to identify experimental builds of JavaFX [v2]

Kevin Rushforth kcr at openjdk.org
Sat Nov 16 15:16:11 UTC 2024


On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 05:48:15 GMT, Ambarish Rapte <arapte at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Introduce a new build property `jfx.experimental.release.suffix` to be used for the early access builds of an under development feature in JavaFX.
>> This property would be set to a value ONLY in a branch specific to an experiment in [jfx-sandbox](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx-sandbox) repo.
>> For example:
>> For the metal branch in jfx-sandbox repo, it would be set to `-metal`.  The javafx.version for the early access build generated from that branch would be `24-metal`.
>> 
>> And it would always be empty for master branch in both main jfx repo and in jfx-sandbox repo.
>> This change has no effect on a regular developer build from master branch.
>
> Ambarish Rapte has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'master' into exp-suffix
>  - 8343196: Add build property to identify experimental builds of JavaFX

Looks good. I left a couple comments and will reapprove if you decide to make the changes.

build.gradle line 705:

> 703:     } else {
> 704:         relSuffix = jfxExperimentalReleaseSuffix != "" ?
> 705:                         jfxExperimentalReleaseSuffix : jfxReleaseSuffix;

One thought I had: we might also want to set `relOpt = "-${buildTimestamp}"` here like we do for internal builds so we always see a time stamp for experimental builds. What do you think?

build.properties line 42:

> 40: 
> 41: # The experimental release suffix is set only in jfx-sandbox repository
> 42: # for a speficic branch. When this property is set it overrides

Do you want to say something about it needing to start with a `-`? Or do you think the example of `-ea` above will be clear enough?

-------------

Marked as reviewed by kcr (Lead).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1637#pullrequestreview-2440546348
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1637#discussion_r1844995084
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1637#discussion_r1844995524


More information about the openjfx-dev mailing list