RFR: 8343196: Add build property to identify experimental builds of JavaFX [v2]

[Kevin Rushforth]

On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 09:02:56 GMT, Johan Vos <jvos at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> If we do this, then here are some possible names:
>> 
>> * jfx.experimental.release
>> * jfx.experimental.release.name
>> * jfx.variant.release
>> * jfx.variant.release.name
>> * jfx.variant
>> * jfx.feature.variant
>> 
>> Thoughts?
>
>> If we do this, then here are some possible names:
>> 
>> * jfx.experimental.release
>> * jfx.experimental.release.name
>> * jfx.variant.release
>> * jfx.variant.release.name
>> * jfx.variant
>> * jfx.feature.variant
>> 
>> Thoughts?
> 
> I don't have objections against any of those.
> If I have to vote, my vote would go to "jfx.feature.name" (which is not in the list ;) ) because I associate variant rather with a single option from a wider set (e.g. prism variants are sw, es2,,...)
> But I am more than happy with any name on this list.

Looks good now. @johanvos this should be ready for your review.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1637#issuecomment-2486219699