RFR: 8324941: POC for Headless platform for JavaFX [v2]

[Johan Vos]

On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 20:15:52 GMT, Andy Goryachev <angorya at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> There was a failing test, so it turns out there is an implicit contract that even if a resize is requested without different w/h parameters, at least the even should still be generated.
>
> should we either add a comment or clean up (or both) then?

I cleaned it up. Typically, I'm +1 on adding more comments in the code, but not everyone likes that. In this case, it would create a precedent where we would then add tons of comments mainly to document what the tests are doing (or expecting).

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1836#discussion_r2189215582