RFR: 8364049: ToolBar shows overflow menu with fractional scale [v3]
Andy Goryachev
angorya at openjdk.org
Wed Jul 30 21:16:03 UTC 2025
On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 18:52:20 GMT, Andy Goryachev <angorya at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This is a very localized fix for the issue described in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8364049 which resulted from comparing snapped and non-snapped values. The issue seems to happen only with fractional scale, that is, on Windows at 125%, 150%, 175% etc. scales.
>>
>> ---
>>
>> While looking at the `ToolBarSkin` code, I noticed a general pattern related to snapping, that might cause similar issues in the tool bar skin and elsewhere. Here is an example in `ToolBarSkin::computePrefWidth()` in L411:
>>
>>
>> if (toolbar.getOrientation() == Orientation.HORIZONTAL) {
>> for (Node node : toolbar.getItems()) {
>> if (!node.isManaged()) continue;
>> prefWidth += snapSizeX(node.prefWidth(-1)) + getSpacing();
>> }
>> prefWidth -= getSpacing();
>> } else {
>>
>>
>> the general issue, in my opinion, is that doing `prefWidth += snapSizeX(node.prefWidth(-1)) + getSpacing();` results in the `prefWidth` value differ from its snapped value. In other words, whenever computation involves snapped values, the result must be snapped as well - and that includes the case when all the parts of the computation are snapped.
>>
>> Another, related, topic is how to properly snap the values in the computation. I would say ideally it should be done like this:
>>
>>
>> snappedResult = snap(snap(value1) .OP. snap(value2) .OP. ... snap (valueN))
>>
>>
>> It might be possible to skip the snapping of intermediary values, and only snap the result, but one must be careful not to accumulate errors.
>>
>> Getting back to the ToolBarSkin, one can see the issue on LL392, 399, 411, 417, 425, 436, 530, and so on.
>>
>> I decided not to fix the snapping for the purpose of making this PR narrow in scope with the goal to backport it to jfx25, but I did want to describe the issue.
>
> Andy Goryachev has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> get toolbar length
I can't get it to fail with a unit test, and I don't want a headful test here.
Here is a test which passes in master though it should fail (a part of ToolbarTest):
@Test
public void noOverflowAtScales() {
// typical windows scales
double[] scales = {
1.0,
1.25,
1.5,
1.75,
2.0,
2.25
};
Button b = new Button("Create Schema");
b.setFont(Font.font("System", 13));
toolBar.getItems().add(b);
BorderPane bp = new BorderPane();
bp.setTop(new HBox(toolBar));
stage = new Stage();
stage.setScene(new Scene(bp, 600, 600));
stage.show();
tk.firePulse();
toolBar.setOrientation(Orientation.HORIZONTAL);
tk.firePulse();
for (double scale : scales) {
toolBar.setScaleX(scale);
toolBar.setScaleY(scale);
double w = bp.prefWidth(-1);
bp.resize(w, 100);
tk.firePulse();
tk.firePulse();
assertOverflowNotShown();
System.out.println(toolBar.getScaleX());
}
toolBar.setOrientation(Orientation.VERTICAL);
tk.firePulse();
for (double scale : scales) {
toolBar.setScaleX(scale);
toolBar.setScaleY(scale);
tk.firePulse();
assertOverflowNotShown();
}
}
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1856#issuecomment-3137832092
More information about the openjfx-dev
mailing list