RFR: 8290310: ChangeListener events are incorrect or misleading when a nested change occurs [v12]

Mon Mar 10 17:42:10 UTC 2025

On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 17:22:16 GMT, Michael Strauß <mstrauss at openjdk.org> wrote:

> What if we didn't call back the second listener (as you said, it would probably result in an infinite loop), and logged an error instead (that's not without precedence, bindings also log errors)? It seems like this would still allow other listeners to receive notifications, while the "defective" listener would not.

I'm fine with logging a warning/error instead.  If Nir also agrees, I can make the modifications.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1081#issuecomment-2711355636