RFR: 8350136: Create release notes for JavaFX 24 [v3]

[Kevin Rushforth]

On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 20:57:51 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <kcr at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This is similar (but not quite the same) to the case of a bug that was introduced and fixed in the same release, which we exclude with the rationale that the end user or app developer who updates from one release to the next never sees the interim state. I can see a case for excluding these two third-party updates using the same reasoning.
>> 
>> What do others think? @hjohn @johanvos @andy-goryachev-oracle ?
>
>> I am in favor of keeping intermediary revisions for the same reason @kevinrushforth mentioned, and also because it eliminates manual filtering (?) and associated mistakes.
> 
> Actually, I was pointing out that it might be more consistent to _not_ keep them -- treating them like transiently introduced bugs -- but I can see both points. I'll let this percolate for a day or two and then we can decide.
> 
> By default I'll leave them in since that's what we've done in the past, but they add little value.

I decided to remove these two bugs. In addition to avoiding confusion, listing those two releases, which have publishes CVEs logged against them, will leave a mistaken impression that JavaFX is vulnerable to the bugs associated with those two older versions.

To address the filtering issues I defined two new labels: `javafx-rn-exclude` and `javafx-rn-include`, which can be applied to bugs and are used to filter in the same way that the `noreg-*` labels already are. The filter now has no manual list of bugs to include or exclude.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1712#discussion_r1994385908