RFR: 8341670: [Text, TextFlow] Public API for Text Layout Info [v27]

[Andy Goryachev]

On Thu, 22 May 2025 00:05:29 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <kcr at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Andy Goryachev has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 55 commits:
>> 
>>  - review comments
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into ag.text.layout.api
>>  - review comments
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into ag.text.layout.api
>>  - sealed
>>  - indent
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into ag.text.layout.api
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into ag.text.layout.api
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into ag.text.layout.api
>>  - twice
>>  - ... and 45 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/compare/d5f569cf...0ac75dae
>
> modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/javafx/scene/text/Text.java line 1123:
> 
>> 1121:      * @since 25
>> 1122:      */
>> 1123:     public final PathElement[] getStrikeThroughShape(int start, int end) {
> 
> I just noticed that this is named `getStrikeThroughShape` rather than `strikeThroughShape`. The latter would match the similar `rangeShape`, `caretShape`, and `underlineShape` methods. We had discussed that you might propose to fix [JDK-8341438](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8341438) by deprecating `rangeShape` and `underlineShape` and adding new `getRangeShape` and `getUnderlineShape` methods (although that might be problematic given the `caretShape` property, which necessarily already has a no-arg `getCaretShape()` method).
> 
> Did you name this method `getStrikeThroughShape` with the intention that it would have the fixed semantics of applying the insets from its inception? If so, then I recommend documenting that fact in this method.

We discussed this with @kevinrushforth - I am going to remove the `getStrikeThroughShape()` method from Text/TextFlow in this PR, and add it under either a separate ticket, or as a part of https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8341438

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1596#discussion_r2103122008