<div dir="ltr"><div>Homebrew seems to be using xcode 14.1 for macOS 13, so most of the reports we receive are from macOS 13/13.1.<br></div><div><br></div> <a href="https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/blob/260ee0ee6af21d31e8c57f6855d661ff6b325fb9/Library/Homebrew/os/mac/xcode.rb#L49">https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/blob/260ee0ee6af21d31e8c57f6855d661ff6b325fb9/Library/Homebrew/os/mac/xcode.rb#L49</a><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 4:13 AM Kevin Rushforth <<a href="mailto:kevin.rushforth@oracle.com">kevin.rushforth@oracle.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
One small correction: Oracle builds of JDK 20 are built using Xcode
12.4 + MacOSX SDK 11. The result is the same: builds of JDK from
Oracle will not hit this problem (at least not yet; we will likely
update the compiler some time in the JDK 21 time frame).<br>
<br>
-- Kevin<br>
<br>
<br>
<div>On 1/18/2023 10:57 AM, Johan Vos wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Hi,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I'm trying to understand the severity of this. If I
understand it correctly, the issue (which is really a bug, no
question about that) only occurs when running with a JDK that
is built with XCode 14.1 (and MacOS SDK 13).</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Is that correct? If so, are there JDK builds out there that
are built with XCode 14.1? From the docs/building.md file in
openjdk, I believe the daily builds (by Oracle) are done using
Xcode 10.1. I don't know what Oracle and others are using in
their JDK releases, but I would be surprised if all of them
are building with XCode 14.1?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Do you control which JDK is used, or is it up to your users
to pick a JDK and then use that one? If users are using a
really recent version of the JDK (built with Xcode 14.1) it
seems to me they can also easily use a really recent version
of JavaFX (20-ea)? </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I am probably missing something, so it would be good to get
a better understanding of the context?</div>
<div>I totally agree that we have to make it as easy as possible
for end-users to run JavaFX applications, so we should
consider whatever is required to achieve this.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>- Johan</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 5:04
PM Glavo <<a href="mailto:zjx001202@gmail.com" target="_blank">zjx001202@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">After looking forward to it for a month, I was
happy to see the release of OpenJFX 19.0.2, but I was
surprised to find that the update log did not contain
JDK-8296654.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I want to know whether this problem has been solved in
OpenJFX 19.0.2? <br>
</div>
<div>I think this is a very serious problem that needs to be
repaired urgently.<br>
</div>
<div>OpenJFX 20 will not be released until a few months
later, and it is no longer compatible with JDK 11, so we
cannot wait until that time to update it.<br>
</div>
<div>If 19.0.2 does not include the fix of JDK-8296654, can
I ask you to release 19.0.2.1?<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote></div>