RFR [nicl] 8201129: C nested types and anonymous types are not handled properly

[Samuel Audet]

Ok, that's cool. Although, it sounds like jextract needs to create a dummy
object in Java to cover that case...

2018年4月20日(金) 8:01 Sundararajan Athijegannathan <
sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com>:

> That works fine - 'bar' is the field name in Foo struct that is of
> struct type (which happens to have "foo" field). No clash there. I
> didn't include in the test because I wanted simple exists/does-not-exist
> checks - hence used different names.
>
> And this ->
>
> struct Foo {
>      int foo;
>      struct {
>          int foo;
>      };
> };
>
> is a compilation error ("member of anonymous struct redeclares 'foo'").
> So that case is covered as well.
>
> -Sundar
>
> On 19/04/18, 3:24 PM, Samuel Audet wrote:
> > All the variables in the test case have different names though.
> > What happens with something like this?
> >
> > struct Foo {
> >     int foo;
> >     struct {
> >         int foo;
> >     } bar;
> > };
> >
> > Samuel
> >
> > On 04/20/2018 06:50 AM, Sundararajan Athijegannathan wrote:
> >> Please review http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8201129/webrev.00/
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Sundar
> >
>