[foreign] RFR: simplify implementation classes
Maurizio Cimadamore
maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com
Mon May 14 10:44:03 UTC 2018
On 14/05/18 06:09, Sundararajan Athijegannathan wrote:
> Quick comment on java.lang.Runtime change. We can avoid a new public
> API in Runtime by using SharedSecrets pattern
> (jdk.internal.misc.SharedSecrets). I think it is better to avoid
> exposing Libray/Symbol/Pointer etc. via j.l.Runtime. For now, we
> could have the method in Runtime as pure implementation helper (though
> we may choose to expose a new API method in Runtime class later).
Thanks for the comment - here's a revised webrev that used the
SharedSecrets trick:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mcimadamore/panama/cleanup-v2/
Maurizio
>
> -Sundar
>
> On 11/05/18, 10:45 PM, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote:
>> Hi,
>> it's spring cleaning in Panama-land :-)
>>
>> Before moving forward with the revised design, I thought it would be
>> better to consolidate the internal implementation a bit. So I started
>> removing classes that didn't seem necessary - I ended up with a much
>> bigger changeset than I anticipated, but I think this is not bad
>> news, in fact I believe this is a big simplification over what we
>> had. Here's some highlights:
>>
>> * I removed the PLatform class and all its OS-dependent Host
>> subclasses. The reality is that, at least for now, we only support
>> SystemV ABI, and little endianness everywhere. So having all these
>> intermediate steps seemed way too convoluted (and error prone as we
>> learned earlier this week). Now SystemABI has a getInstance method
>> which returns the default for that platform. For library loading, see
>> below.
>>
>> * Errno. This is also gone. Errno should be part of a wider Posix
>> implementation effort; there's little value in having it there. It
>> was only used by a test, (UnixSystem) which is easily fixable with
>> 3-4 lines of code.
>>
>> * LdLoader/LibraryLoader. This is probably the biggest change. As
>> we've discussed we have a lot of custom logic that 'just' loads
>> native libraries. In reality the JDK already has code to do this, but
>> the problem is that it doesn't expose the library entry point back to
>> the Java code. I looked at how we might massage the JDK
>> implementation, and it's actually quite easy: ClassLoader stores
>> loaded libraries in a class called NativeLibrary, which has a
>> (native) method to lookup entries, etc. We can have this class
>> implement our nicl/Library interface, and then have
>> ClassLoader.loadLibrary returns one of these.
>>
>> There's one caveat: when we load a new library, we need to pass a
>> class whose loader is used to 'hook' the native library (so that when
>> the classloader is GCed the native library is unloaded).
>> Runtime.loadLibrary achieves this with a @CallerSensitive, but that's
>> only useful if the client calls that code. Here we also need the
>> binder to call that code - so a saner approach is to pass a
>> MethodHandles.Lookup - and use the lookup class as the class whose
>> loader is hooked to the native lib. That works very well.
>>
>> * As a result of the above class loader cleanup, we could get rid of
>> UnixLibrary and UnixDynamicLibraries too
>>
>> * BindingRegistry: this is not used, and if we need something like
>> it, it will come back in a different shape
>>
>> * ContainerSizeInfo: this is an interface which is only implemented
>> by AbstractABI. Seems like a case of premature abstraction.
>>
>> * UncheckedPointer: this is used to create pointers w/o bounds - this
>> is just a factory method in BoundedPointer (which happened to be
>> there already: createNativeVoidPointer).
>>
>> In total, this patch removes 14 classes, and, crucially, it removes
>> the duplication of the library loading logic. I suspect further
>> cleanup is also possible in Libraries/LibrariesHelper, but I'll leave
>> this to Sundar who's more familiar with that code and its interaction
>> with jextract. (I suspect some of the SecurityManager checks are not
>> needed anymore, since those would be carried out by the main class
>> loader logic).
>>
>> Webrev:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mcimadamore/panama/cleanup/
>>
>> Cheers
>> Maurizio
>>
More information about the panama-dev
mailing list