[foreign-abi] RFR: 8228762: import CallingSequenceBuilder unit tests
Jorn Vernee
jbvernee at xs4all.nl
Thu Aug 1 14:26:55 UTC 2019
Looks good!
Jorn
On 2019-08-01 09:34, Nick Gasson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've updated the webrev with the ArgumentClass test removed:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ngasson/foreign/8228762/webrev.1/
>
> OK to push?
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
>
> On 31/07/2019 22:03, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote:
>> Yeah - that test is very old and it was one of the few tests we had on
>> the ABI when I started working on that.
>>
>> I think we have much better (and more portable tests) now, and this
>> can
>> go (perhaps even from foreign branch).
>>
>> Cheers
>> Maurizio
>>
>> On 31/07/2019 03:23, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>>> I'm okay with dropping it. ArgumentClassTest actually pre-dates me
>>> being a part of the project :) (I added CallingSequenceTestBase not
>>> too long ago in this area though, when I added the Windows version of
>>> CallingSequenceTest)
>>>
>>> Jorn
>>>
>>> On 2019-07-31 10:10, Nick Gasson wrote:
>>>> Hi Maurizio,
>>>>
>>>>> Looks good, but I'm a bit puzzled by the ArgumentClassTest; in
>>>>> general
>>>>> the test seems pretty obscure - but there's also the problem that
>>>>> the
>>>>> test is ultimately SysV specific, so it will only stress the
>>>>> ArgumentClassImpl specific to SysV. Not sure this test is robust
>>>>> enough
>>>>> (as the other) to make the cut, to be honest.
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This one got included because I took the whole test/jdk/foreign/abi
>>>> directory from the foreign branch. I agree it's not as useful as the
>>>> main CallingSequenceTest which should test the merge method
>>>> indirectly
>>>> anyway. I'm happy to take it out of this patch if Jorn agrees too?
>>>> (I
>>>> think he added it originally.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nick
More information about the panama-dev
mailing list