Possible bug in jextract C header definition?

[Mark Hammons]

I'll give it a shot tonight or tomorrow. Thanks Maurizio!

On 08/08/2019 23:13, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote:
> New builds just got out of the oven :-)
>
> https://jdk.java.net/panama/
>
> Maurizio
>
> On 06/08/2019 19:21, Mark Hammons wrote:
>> Great, glad to hear it, and I’m looking forward to testing the new 
>> builds.
>>
>> ~Mark
>>
>>> On 6 Aug 2019, at 17:55, Maurizio Cimadamore 
>>> <maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Mark,
>>> we suspect that both issues you are seeing could be related to some 
>>> of the fixes that went in *after* the snapshots were last generated.
>>>
>>> We will do some stabilization work on panama/foreign and then 
>>> trigger a new binary snapshot. I'm confident this will resolve your 
>>> issues.
>>>
>>> Maurizio
>>>
>>>> On 06/08/2019 15:43, Mark Hammons wrote:
>>>> Hi Maurizio
>>>>
>>>> If you're talking about the inner class issue with dotty's 
>>>> compiler, it appears to be a small issue with the inner class 
>>>> generation of jextract that dotty is not happy with, but the scala 
>>>> compiler is. I am not certain that the problem lies with jextract, 
>>>> but so far my attempts to debug it with the dotty team have stalled 
>>>> (they appear to be busy working on other things) and I have 
>>>> received no response from them.
>>>>
>>>> I would love to test the issues with the latest versions of panama, 
>>>> and the one above was the very first one I tested recently. Right 
>>>> now my approach to getting jextract working with dotty is to hand 
>>>> generate bindings to the foreign api rather than use jextract.
>>>>
>>>> ~Mark
>>>>
>>>>> On 06/08/2019 16:25, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote:
>>>>> Hi Mark - that version is quite old (we should refresh it soon), 
>>>>> and the fix for __va_list is not contained in that build.
>>>>>
>>>>> We would appreciate if you could help narrowing down the other 
>>>>> issue you have reported, to make sure that that is also fixed in 
>>>>> the latest sources. Could you help with that? More specifically, 
>>>>> the errors you mentioned do not seem like jextract errors - what's 
>>>>> going on?
>>>>>
>>>>> Maurizio
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 06/08/2019 15:09, Mark Hammons wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I do apparently have the latest version (ea-70), and it's being 
>>>>>> mapped to __va_list_tag instead for some reason.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ~Mark
>>>>>>
>>>>>>