[foreign-memaccess] scopes and thread confinement

[Jorn Vernee]

Sure, so the global scope implementation will not have this list, but it 
can not be closed any ways. Then the forked scope implementations will 
have this list, they can be closed, and use the list to close the 
children as well.

So there would still be a link from parents to children _except_ for the 
global scope Right?

Jorn

Maurizio Cimadamore schreef op 2019-05-21 19:48:
> On 21/05/2019 15:17, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>> I'm not sure about the second point. The descendant list could be 
>> removed, but forked scopes could keep it right (so no need for 
>> recursive checks)?
> 
> If we don't have links from parents to children, when you close the
> parent it won't be possible to trigger close of the children. Instead,
> children will have to look back at the parent and see if that has been
> closed. Do we agree?
> 
> Maurizio