[foreign-abi] On invokers

[Maurizio Cimadamore]

On 26/09/2019 00:03, Samuel Audet wrote:
> I didn't mean it as inflammatory, just that it doesn't fit in the 
> API/implementation separation that you're striving to achieve. I could 
> elaborate, there are many technical issues with your approach, but 
> since you haven't heard me out in the past, I just don't have the 
> feeling that you'll hear me out this time around. 

On the contrary, if you have specific feedback on the memory access API 
(foreign-memaccess) branch, or the low-level method handle based API 
(memacess-abi branch) for doing foreign calls, I'd love to hear it. 
Especially the memory access API is getting there in terms of being 
complete - so now would be a good time to provide feedback. But please 
do so on a different thread :-)

Maurizio