[vectorIntrinsics] RFR: Refactor JVM Interface
Viswanathan, Sandhya
sandhya.viswanathan at intel.com
Wed Mar 25 20:29:34 UTC 2020
Hi Vladimir,
>> The patch also fixes one long standing vbox related issue that we were seeing on one of our platforms.
>Can you elaborate here a bit, please? Is it related to missing safepoint polls?
The failure used to be reported as follows for VectorConversionTests.java on KNL platform. With the refactor now the test passes.
# To suppress the following error report, specify this argument
# after -XX: or in .hotspotrc: SuppressErrorAt=/compile.cpp:2760
#
# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
# Internal Error ( vectorIntrinsics/src/hotspot/share/opto/compile.cpp:2760), pid=268802, tid=268817
# Error: assert(!vbox->is_Phi()) failed
...
# Problematic frame:
# V [libjvm.so+0x932921] Compile::expand_vbox_node_helper(Node*, Node*, TypeInstPtr const*, TypeVect const*)+0x81
#
From hs_err file:
Current CompileTask:
C2: 639330 2033 % VectorConversionTests::conversion_kernel @ 84 (300 bytes)
Stack: [0x00007ff4680ef000,0x00007ff4681f0000], sp=0x00007ff4681eb450, free space=1009k
Native frames: (J=compiled Java code, A=aot compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code, C=native code)
V [libjvm.so+0x932921] Compile::expand_vbox_node_helper(Node*, Node*, TypeInstPtr const*, TypeVect const*)+0x81
V [libjvm.so+0x932d84] Compile::expand_vbox_node(VectorBoxNode*)+0x84
V [libjvm.so+0x942cc8] Compile::expand_vbox_nodes()+0x128
V [libjvm.so+0x9437e8] Compile::Optimize()+0x648
V [libjvm.so+0x945612] Compile::Compile(ciEnv*, C2Compiler*, ciMethod*, int, bool, bool, bool, DirectiveSet*)+0x1172
V [libjvm.so+0x7b55d5] C2Compiler::compile_method(ciEnv*, ciMethod*, int, DirectiveSet*)+0x305
V [libjvm.so+0x9523af] CompileBroker::invoke_compiler_on_method(CompileTask*)+0x38f
V [libjvm.so+0x953263] CompileBroker::compiler_thread_loop()+0x393
V [libjvm.so+0x17ce56a] JavaThread::thread_main_inner()+0x17a
V [libjvm.so+0x17d3bc6] Thread::call_run()+0xf6
V [libjvm.so+0x13972b5] thread_native_entry(Thread*)+0x125
Best Regards,
Sandhya
-----Original Message-----
From: Vladimir Ivanov <vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 3:22 AM
To: Viswanathan, Sandhya <sandhya.viswanathan at intel.com>; panama-dev <panama-dev at openjdk.java.net>
Subject: Re: [vectorIntrinsics] RFR: Refactor JVM Interface
Hi Sandhya,
> The vector api tests pass on all Intel platforms with this patch.
Thank you!
> Only one minor build issue was there due to a last remaining UseVectorApiIntrinsics use in stubGenerator_x86_64.cpp.
Good catch. Fixed.
> The patch also fixes one long standing vbox related issue that we were seeing on one of our platforms.
Can you elaborate here a bit, please? Is it related to missing safepoint polls?
> Please go ahead and check in.
Pushed.
Best regards,
Vladimir Ivanov
> -----Original Message-----
> From: panama-dev <panama-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net> On Behalf Of
> Vladimir Ivanov
> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 2:07 PM
> To: panama-dev <panama-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> Subject: [vectorIntrinsics] RFR: Refactor JVM Interface
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/panama/vector/new_jvm_interface/w
> ebrev.00/
>
> (First cleanup pass over the JVM implementation.
> The focus is on JVM-JDK interface.)
>
> New JVM interface is minimal and contains intrinsics, well-known
> classes, and opcode declarations. It resides in java.base
> (jdk.internal.vm.vector.VectorSupport) and exports the interface to jdk.incubator.vector module.
>
> JVM doesn't need to know about typed vectors anymore: VectorPayload,
> VectorMask, and VectorShuffle are enough to represent all interesting
> cases and provide enough information to the JVM how to handle vector
> classes:
>
> - VectorPayload class represents vector values which are amenable to aggressive box elimination transformation
> * vector on-heap representation remains primitive array-backed;
> * classes which extend VectorPayload should declare 2 static
> fields (VLENGTH and ETYPE) which describe vector on-heap
> representation to the JVM (array length and its element type);
>
> - VectorShuffle and VectorMask mark vector shuffles and masks for
> the JVM;
>
> - VectorSpecies and Vector are there to enhance type checking of
> JVM intrinsic usages;
>
>
> Also, additional refactorings/fixes:
>
> * merged reinterpret and cast intrinsics into one (convert)
>
> * refactored rematerialization support
>
> * don't remove unused VectorBoxAllocate nodes, but replace them
> with safepoints
>
> * VM vector support is turned off by default, but automatically
> enabled when user adds jdk.incubator.vector incubator module to the
> graph
>
> * multiple minor fixes and cleanups along the way
>
> Testing: jdk/incubator/vector tests
>
> Best regards,
> Vladimir Ivanov
>
More information about the panama-dev
mailing list