[foreign-memaccess+abi] RFR: 8310362: Improve composability of handle derived from layouts
Jorn Vernee
jvernee at openjdk.org
Thu Jun 22 17:46:30 UTC 2023
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 13:18:42 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore <mcimadamore at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Me and Maurizio have been discussing how to better address certain use cases like accessing structs with variable length array members, or matrices that have a dynamic row and column size.
>>
>> The solution we came up with is captured in this patch. It adds an additional base offset parameter to the handles produced by `MemoryLayout::varHandle`, `MemoryLayout::sliceHandle` and `MemoryLayout::byteOffsetHandle`. This allows these handles to be composed with other offset computations that are not necessarily derived from layouts.
>>
>> This patch also adds a `scale` method to MemoryLayout, which can be used to scale and index by the size of a layout. Essentially: `offset + layout.byteSize() * index`. This is useful for expressing ad-hoc offset computations. A `scaleHandle` method is also added for convience, which returns a MethodHandle for `scale` bound to the receiver layout.
>>
>> Both these changes allowed for several simplifications:
>> - `MethodHandles::memorySegmentViewVarHandle` can be removed, as it's now exactly the same as calling ML::varHandle on a ValueLayout with an empty layout path. (the former method also didn't take advantage of the access handle cache found on ValueLayouts).
>> - `ValueLayout::arrayHandle` is removed, as most use cases can now simply be expressed using ML::varHandle + ML::scaleHandle. e.g.:
>>
>> MethodHandles.collectCoordinates(layout.varHandle(),
>> 1, MethodHandles.insertArguments(layout.scaleHandle(), 0, 0L));
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/foreign/MemorySegment.java line 130:
>
>> 128: * }
>> 129: *
>> 130: * More complex access operations can be expressed using var handles. The {@link ValueLayout#varHandle()}
>
> Expressed or Implemented?
I think either one works. i.e. we're expressing a idea in a programming language. I'll switch to 'implemented', it feels a bit more colloquial.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/panama-foreign/pull/840#discussion_r1238849044
More information about the panama-dev
mailing list