[foreign-memaccess+abi] RFR: 8310362: Improve composability of handle derived from layouts [v2]
Jorn Vernee
jvernee at openjdk.org
Thu Jun 22 23:14:40 UTC 2023
On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 19:21:35 GMT, Jorn Vernee <jvernee at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Me and Maurizio have been discussing how to better address certain use cases like accessing structs with variable length array members, or matrices that have a dynamic row and column size.
>>
>> The solution we came up with is captured in this patch. It adds an additional base offset parameter to the handles produced by `MemoryLayout::varHandle`, `MemoryLayout::sliceHandle` and `MemoryLayout::byteOffsetHandle`. This allows these handles to be composed with other offset computations that are not necessarily derived from layouts.
>>
>> This patch also adds a `scale` method to MemoryLayout, which can be used to scale and index by the size of a layout. Essentially: `offset + layout.byteSize() * index`. This is useful for expressing ad-hoc offset computations. A `scaleHandle` method is also added for convience, which returns a MethodHandle for `scale` bound to the receiver layout.
>>
>> Both these changes allowed for several simplifications:
>> - `MethodHandles::memorySegmentViewVarHandle` can be removed, as it's now exactly the same as calling ML::varHandle on a ValueLayout with an empty layout path. (the former method also didn't take advantage of the access handle cache found on ValueLayouts).
>> - `ValueLayout::arrayHandle` is removed, as most use cases can now simply be expressed using ML::varHandle + ML::scaleHandle. e.g.:
>>
>> MethodHandles.collectCoordinates(layout.varHandle(),
>> 1, MethodHandles.insertArguments(layout.scaleHandle(), 0, 0L));
>
> Jorn Vernee has updated the pull request incrementally with five additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - missing changes
> - rework offset computation doc
> - address most review comments
> - add collectCoordinates void filter review changes
> - include root layout check review changes
Addressed the review comments, added some tests for the updated `scale` as well.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/panama-foreign/pull/840#issuecomment-1603422143
More information about the panama-dev
mailing list