From martinrb at google.com  Tue Jul  1 21:49:20 2014
From: martinrb at google.com (Martin Buchholz)
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 14:49:20 -0700
Subject: RFR(S): JDK-8043780 Use open(O_CLOEXEC) instead of
	fcntl(FD_CLOEXEC)
In-Reply-To: <CA+kOe08L0N-tad1FGQSnxrVEV0xN7BkhV2i-=F4EfA8Kug+UFg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+kOe08L0N-tad1FGQSnxrVEV0xN7BkhV2i-=F4EfA8Kug+UFg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CA+kOe08smJ6Z9MzADVUqLiwhyaOh_P3diikmoAeW0tr4rOYYiA@mail.gmail.com>

Ping. Please review this change.

It is in production use locally on Linux.  Please either accept this change
as is (Linux only), or work with this patch to create a more ambitious
patch that addresses other Unix variants.

Adding porters-dev.


On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Martin Buchholz <martinrb at google.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'd like to contribute a patch.
>
> Webrev:
>   http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk9/O_CLOEXEC/
>
> Bug:
>   https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043780
>
> If accepted, corresponding changes should be made to the other Unix
> variants, but I can't do any testing there.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/porters-dev/attachments/20140701/1a6f618c/attachment.html>