A last sync of stage?

[Vladimir Kozlov]

Hi,

I synced 8u into ppc-aix stage repo. It includes all remaining fixes now.
Please, verify that it good and we can freeze it.

Regards,
Vladimir

On 3/27/14 12:42 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> Thank you, Volker
>
> I backported both 8035970 and 8035396 fixes.
> We have only 3 issues left, I think, before we can freeze ppc-aix-port/stage:
>
> 8036767 PPC64: Support for little endian execution model
> 8038201: Clean up misleading usage of malloc() in init_system_properties_values()
> 8038498: Fix includes and C inlining after 8035330
>
> Regards,
> Vladimir
>
> On 3/27/14 8:04 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
>> Hi Vladimir,
>>
>> thanks for doing the sync. After this sync we need to downport the
>> additional change "8035970: PPC64: fix ad file after 8027754: Enable
>> loop optimizations for loops with MathExact":
>>
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/hotspot/rev/7e8e4d1a41d6
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035970
>>
>> And please also don't forget to push "8035396: Introduce accessor for
>> tmp_oop in frame" to stage (it is needed for the PPC64 template
>> interpreter). You wanted to do it before but there were some problems
>> with the closed repositories that time.
>>
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/hotspot/rev/78112be27ba0
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035396
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/webrevs/8035396-1-tmpOop/
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2014-February/012643.html
>>
>> I have just checked that both these changes apply cleanly to the
>> current stage repository.
>>
>> Thank you and best regards,
>> Volker
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Vladimir Kozlov
>> <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
>>> I synced jdk8u/hs-dev into ppc-aix-port/stage today. I pushed 8034797 too as
>>> part of sync.
>>>
>>> I think it will be the last sync. Please, check that everything is okay for
>>> you.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Vladimir
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/14/14 11:19 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Got it, I need to backport only 8035423 after sync today.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Vladimir
>>>>
>>>> On 3/14/14 9:46 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I think what Goetz was trying to say is that if you would currently
>>>>> sync with jdk8u-dev you'll need to also push 8035423 ("AIX: Fix
>>>>> os::get_default_process_handle() in os_aix.cpp after 8031968" from
>>>>> jdk9/jdk9/hotspot to stage because 8035423 fixes 8031968 which will
>>>>> come from jdk8u-dev into stage.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you do the push later and jdk8u-dev already contains 8028280
>>>>> (currently it is only in hs-dev) youll also need to push 8034797 from
>>>>> jdk9/jdk9/hotspot to stage for the same reason.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you and best regards,
>>>>> Volker
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Vladimir Kozlov
>>>>> <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I tried to do sync yesterday but JPRT did not behave well. I will try it
>>>>>> again today.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please, clarify which fix I need to push where. Sorry, I don't get
>>>>>> what you
>>>>>> said.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Vladimir
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/14/14 7:54 AM, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Vladimir,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think it would make sense to sync stage a last time, what
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> do you think?  The last sync was two weeks ago.  If the date
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> of 21^st is met, we don’t need another I would guess.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Two changes were downported that require fixes in the port:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I saw 8031968 in jdk8u-dev and hs-dev.  This requires
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>           8035423: AIX: Fix os::get_default_process_handle() in
>>>>>>> os_aix.cpp
>>>>>>> after 8031968
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 8028280 so far is only in hs-dev, which requires
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>           8034797: AIX: Fix os::naked_short_sleep() in os_aix.cpp after
>>>>>>> 8028280
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      Goetz.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>