A last sync of stage?

[Volker Simonis]

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com
> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I synced 8u into ppc-aix stage repo. It includes all remaining fixes now.
> Please, verify that it good and we can freeze it.
>
>
Hi Vladimir,

one could really think you’re crazy about finally freezing the stage repo:)

I've just tested with the last changes and everything looks fine.

Tremendous thanks for all your help (especially for such boring tasks like
keeping our staging repositories in sync).

@Iris: could you please switch the
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/ppc-aix-port/stage forest to read-only mode.

Regards,
Volker


> Regards,
> Vladimir
>
>
> On 3/27/14 12:42 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>
>> Thank you, Volker
>>
>> I backported both 8035970 and 8035396 fixes.
>> We have only 3 issues left, I think, before we can freeze
>> ppc-aix-port/stage:
>>
>> 8036767 PPC64: Support for little endian execution model
>> 8038201: Clean up misleading usage of malloc() in
>> init_system_properties_values()
>> 8038498: Fix includes and C inlining after 8035330
>>
>> Regards,
>> Vladimir
>>
>> On 3/27/14 8:04 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Vladimir,
>>>
>>> thanks for doing the sync. After this sync we need to downport the
>>> additional change "8035970: PPC64: fix ad file after 8027754: Enable
>>> loop optimizations for loops with MathExact":
>>>
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/hotspot/rev/7e8e4d1a41d6
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035970
>>>
>>> And please also don't forget to push "8035396: Introduce accessor for
>>> tmp_oop in frame" to stage (it is needed for the PPC64 template
>>> interpreter). You wanted to do it before but there were some problems
>>> with the closed repositories that time.
>>>
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/hotspot/rev/78112be27ba0
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035396
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/webrevs/8035396-1-tmpOop/
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2014-
>>> February/012643.html
>>>
>>> I have just checked that both these changes apply cleanly to the
>>> current stage repository.
>>>
>>> Thank you and best regards,
>>> Volker
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Vladimir Kozlov
>>> <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I synced jdk8u/hs-dev into ppc-aix-port/stage today. I pushed 8034797
>>>> too as
>>>> part of sync.
>>>>
>>>> I think it will be the last sync. Please, check that everything is okay
>>>> for
>>>> you.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Vladimir
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 3/14/14 11:19 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Got it, I need to backport only 8035423 after sync today.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Vladimir
>>>>>
>>>>> On 3/14/14 9:46 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think what Goetz was trying to say is that if you would currently
>>>>>> sync with jdk8u-dev you'll need to also push 8035423 ("AIX: Fix
>>>>>> os::get_default_process_handle() in os_aix.cpp after 8031968" from
>>>>>> jdk9/jdk9/hotspot to stage because 8035423 fixes 8031968 which will
>>>>>> come from jdk8u-dev into stage.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you do the push later and jdk8u-dev already contains 8028280
>>>>>> (currently it is only in hs-dev) youll also need to push 8034797 from
>>>>>> jdk9/jdk9/hotspot to stage for the same reason.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you and best regards,
>>>>>> Volker
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Vladimir Kozlov
>>>>>> <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I tried to do sync yesterday but JPRT did not behave well. I will
>>>>>>> try it
>>>>>>> again today.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please, clarify which fix I need to push where. Sorry, I don't get
>>>>>>> what you
>>>>>>> said.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Vladimir
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3/14/14 7:54 AM, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Vladimir,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think it would make sense to sync stage a last time, what
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> do you think?  The last sync was two weeks ago.  If the date
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> of 21^st is met, we don’t need another I would guess.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Two changes were downported that require fixes in the port:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I saw 8031968 in jdk8u-dev and hs-dev.  This requires
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>           8035423: AIX: Fix os::get_default_process_handle() in
>>>>>>>> os_aix.cpp
>>>>>>>> after 8031968
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 8028280 so far is only in hs-dev, which requires
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>           8034797: AIX: Fix os::naked_short_sleep() in os_aix.cpp
>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>> 8028280
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>      Goetz.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/ppc-aix-port-dev/attachments/20140411/ceb10365/attachment.html>