A last sync of stage?

[Volker Simonis]

Thanks a lot Iris!

Without your great help this project would not have run so smoothly.

Regards,
Volker



On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Iris Clark <iris.clark at oracle.com> wrote:

> Hi, Volker.
>
>
>
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/ppc-aix-port
>
>
>
> stage is now READ-ONLY.    Yea!
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> iris
>
>
>
> *From:* Volker Simonis [mailto:volker.simonis at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, April 11, 2014 6:07 AM
> *To:* Vladimir Kozlov; Iris Clark
> *Cc:* Azeem Jiva; ppc-aix-port-dev at openjdk.java.net
> *Subject:* Re: A last sync of stage?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Vladimir Kozlov <
> vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I synced 8u into ppc-aix stage repo. It includes all remaining fixes now.
> Please, verify that it good and we can freeze it.
>
>
>
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> one could really think you’re crazy about finally freezing the stage repo:)
>
> I've just tested with the last changes and everything looks fine.
>
> Tremendous thanks for all your help (especially for such boring tasks like
> keeping our staging repositories in sync).
>
> @Iris: could you please switch the
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/ppc-aix-port/stage forest to read-only mode.
>
> Regards,
>
> Volker
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Vladimir
>
>
>
> On 3/27/14 12:42 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>
> Thank you, Volker
>
> I backported both 8035970 and 8035396 fixes.
> We have only 3 issues left, I think, before we can freeze
> ppc-aix-port/stage:
>
> 8036767 PPC64: Support for little endian execution model
> 8038201: Clean up misleading usage of malloc() in
> init_system_properties_values()
> 8038498: Fix includes and C inlining after 8035330
>
> Regards,
> Vladimir
>
> On 3/27/14 8:04 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
>
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> thanks for doing the sync. After this sync we need to downport the
> additional change "8035970: PPC64: fix ad file after 8027754: Enable
> loop optimizations for loops with MathExact":
>
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/hotspot/rev/7e8e4d1a41d6
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035970
>
> And please also don't forget to push "8035396: Introduce accessor for
> tmp_oop in frame" to stage (it is needed for the PPC64 template
> interpreter). You wanted to do it before but there were some problems
> with the closed repositories that time.
>
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/hotspot/rev/78112be27ba0
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035396
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/webrevs/8035396-1-tmpOop/
>
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2014-February/012643.html
>
> I have just checked that both these changes apply cleanly to the
> current stage repository.
>
> Thank you and best regards,
> Volker
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Vladimir Kozlov
> <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
>
> I synced jdk8u/hs-dev into ppc-aix-port/stage today. I pushed 8034797 too
> as
> part of sync.
>
> I think it will be the last sync. Please, check that everything is okay for
> you.
>
> Thanks,
> Vladimir
>
>
> On 3/14/14 11:19 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>
>
> Got it, I need to backport only 8035423 after sync today.
>
> Thanks,
> Vladimir
>
> On 3/14/14 9:46 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I think what Goetz was trying to say is that if you would currently
> sync with jdk8u-dev you'll need to also push 8035423 ("AIX: Fix
> os::get_default_process_handle() in os_aix.cpp after 8031968" from
> jdk9/jdk9/hotspot to stage because 8035423 fixes 8031968 which will
> come from jdk8u-dev into stage.
>
> If you do the push later and jdk8u-dev already contains 8028280
> (currently it is only in hs-dev) youll also need to push 8034797 from
> jdk9/jdk9/hotspot to stage for the same reason.
>
> Thank you and best regards,
> Volker
>
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Vladimir Kozlov
> <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
> I tried to do sync yesterday but JPRT did not behave well. I will try it
> again today.
>
> Please, clarify which fix I need to push where. Sorry, I don't get
> what you
> said.
>
> Thanks,
> Vladimir
>
>
> On 3/14/14 7:54 AM, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> I think it would make sense to sync stage a last time, what
>
> do you think?  The last sync was two weeks ago.  If the date
>
> of 21^st is met, we don’t need another I would guess.
>
>
> Two changes were downported that require fixes in the port:
>
> I saw 8031968 in jdk8u-dev and hs-dev.  This requires
>
>           8035423: AIX: Fix os::get_default_process_handle() in
> os_aix.cpp
> after 8031968
>
> 8028280 so far is only in hs-dev, which requires
>
>           8034797: AIX: Fix os::naked_short_sleep() in os_aix.cpp after
> 8028280
>
> Best regards,
>
>      Goetz.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/ppc-aix-port-dev/attachments/20140411/6649f80c/attachment-0001.html>