A last sync of stage?
Volker Simonis
volker.simonis at gmail.com
Fri Mar 14 16:46:17 UTC 2014
Hi,
I think what Goetz was trying to say is that if you would currently
sync with jdk8u-dev you'll need to also push 8035423 ("AIX: Fix
os::get_default_process_handle() in os_aix.cpp after 8031968" from
jdk9/jdk9/hotspot to stage because 8035423 fixes 8031968 which will
come from jdk8u-dev into stage.
If you do the push later and jdk8u-dev already contains 8028280
(currently it is only in hs-dev) youll also need to push 8034797 from
jdk9/jdk9/hotspot to stage for the same reason.
Thank you and best regards,
Volker
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Vladimir Kozlov
<vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
> I tried to do sync yesterday but JPRT did not behave well. I will try it
> again today.
>
> Please, clarify which fix I need to push where. Sorry, I don't get what you
> said.
>
> Thanks,
> Vladimir
>
>
> On 3/14/14 7:54 AM, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
>>
>> Hi Vladimir,
>>
>> I think it would make sense to sync stage a last time, what
>>
>> do you think? The last sync was two weeks ago. If the date
>>
>> of 21^st is met, we don’t need another I would guess.
>>
>>
>> Two changes were downported that require fixes in the port:
>>
>> I saw 8031968 in jdk8u-dev and hs-dev. This requires
>>
>> 8035423: AIX: Fix os::get_default_process_handle() in os_aix.cpp
>> after 8031968
>>
>> 8028280 so far is only in hs-dev, which requires
>>
>> 8034797: AIX: Fix os::naked_short_sleep() in os_aix.cpp after
>> 8028280
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Goetz.
>>
>
More information about the ppc-aix-port-dev
mailing list