[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] <AWT Dev> Review request for 8034218: AIX: Provide a better fontconfig.properties file

Jonathan Lu luchsh at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue May 20 06:17:42 UTC 2014


Hi Volker,

I've updated the patch by dropping the those fonts configurations from
$JRE_LIB_FONTS directory.
The change is based on the SAP version, current change is primarily adding
support for CJK fonts, pls review.

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~luchsh/JDK-8034218.v2/

Thanks
Jonathan


On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Volker Simonis <volker.simonis at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Jonathan,
>
> from all fontconfig files in make/data/fontconfig,
> solaris.fontconfig.properties is the only file which contains a single
> line referring to $JRE_LIB_FONTS. This is obviously a first-day bug
> which should be fixed.
>
> It simply makes no sense to define font files and default fonts with
> references to files which won't be in a JDK for sure. Again, if you
> could convince IBM to donate the corresponding fonts to the OpenJDK
> that would be great. Otherwise these entries should be dropped from
> the fontconfig files.
>
> Thank you and best regards,
> Volker
>
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Jonathan Lu <luchsh at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Phil, Volker,
> >
> > Thanks for your comments, but I noticed that JRE_LIB_FONTS has been
> referred
> > by the solaris fontconfig file,
> >
> > jdk/make/data/fontconfig/solaris.fontconfig.properties
> >
> > So I'm wondering if we can do this in the same way as Solaris platform.
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > Jonathan
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:47 AM, Phil Race <philip.race at oracle.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> removed awt-dev ...
> >>
> >>
> >> > I don't think we should reference the fonts
> >> > under $JRE_LIB_FONTS/ in the OpenJDK version of fontconfig.properties
> >>
> >> Volker is correct on this point.
> >>
> >> Since OpenJDK can't ship those fonts we made sure they were never used
> >> in any openjdk fontconfig file.
> >>
> >> -phil.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 05/12/2014 09:42 AM, Phil Race wrote:
> >>>
> >>> All,
> >>>
> >>> If you want to continue this discussion i should be restarted on 2d-dev
> >>> and awt-dev removed. AWT has nothing to do with the fonts ..
> >>> I've fixed the bug sub-cat.
> >>>
> >>> -phil.
> >>>
> >>> On 05/12/2014 09:06 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Jonathan,
> >>>>
> >>>> thanks for submitting this patch.
> >>>>
> >>>> Overall it looks good, but I don't think we should reference the fonts
> >>>> under $JRE_LIB_FONTS/ in the OpenJDK version of fontconfig.properties
> >>>> (at least not until IBM will not also contribute the corresponding
> >>>> fonts :)
> >>>>
> >>>> I would also find it helpful to keep a reworked version of the
> comment:
> >>>>
> >>>>    27 # Minimal version for AIX using the standard Latin Type1 Fonts
> >>>> from the
> >>>>    28 # package X11.fnt.iso_T1. These fonts are installed by default
> >>>> into
> >>>>    29 # "/usr/lpp/X11/lib/X11/fonts/Type1" and sym-linked to
> >>>> "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1"
> >>>>
> >>>> which mentions which AIX packages provide the other referenced font
> >>>> files.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thank you and best regards,
> >>>> Volker
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Jonathan Lu
> >>>> <luchsh at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi awt-dev,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please review the fix for issue:
> >>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034218
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The changes are placed at
> >>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~luchsh/JDK-8034218/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This patch is trying to provide a better fonctconfig.properties file
> >>>>> for AIX
> >>>>> platform,
> >>>>> which contains support for more languages, like CJK.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks
> >>>>> Jonathan
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/ppc-aix-port-dev/attachments/20140520/b0ba5e23/attachment.html>


More information about the ppc-aix-port-dev mailing list