[PING] [8u] RFR: 8073139: PPC64: User-visible arch directory and os.arch value on ppc64le cause issues with Java tooling
Severin Gehwolf
sgehwolf at redhat.com
Thu Oct 4 14:40:01 UTC 2018
Hi Goetz,
On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 10:40 +0000, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
[...]
> Did you test this on ppc64 be, too?
I've tested this patch on PPC64 BE Linux now too. There is no change
(as expected):
$ ./jdk8-ppc64be-after/bin/java TestProperty
os.arch == ppc64
java.library.path == /usr/java/packages/lib/ppc64:/usr/lib64:/lib64:/lib:/usr/lib
$ ./jdk8-ppc64be-before/bin/java TestProperty
os.arch == ppc64
java.library.path == /usr/java/packages/lib/ppc64:/usr/lib64:/lib64:/lib:/usr/lib
Thanks,
Severin
> Best regards,
> Goetz.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ppc-aix-port-dev <ppc-aix-port-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net> On
> > Behalf Of Severin Gehwolf
> > Sent: Dienstag, 2. Oktober 2018 12:34
> > To: Erik Joelsson <erik.joelsson at oracle.com>; hotspot-dev <hotspot-
> > dev at openjdk.java.net>; ppc-aix-port-dev <ppc-aix-port-
> > dev at openjdk.java.net>; build-dev <build-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> > Subject: Re: [PING] [8u] RFR: 8073139: PPC64: User-visible arch directory and
> > os.arch value on ppc64le cause issues with Java tooling
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Pinging PPC porters. Does this look reasonable to you?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Severin
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 08:56 -0700, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> > > Build changes look ok to me.
> > >
> > > /Erik
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2018-09-26 04:26, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Could I please get reviews for this JDK 8 backport which fixes some
> > > > tooling issues on Linux ppc64le? Prior this patch, a ppc64le build
> > > > would report as "ppc64" via os.arch system property which breaks
> > > > tooling such as maven in as much as if some dependency needs native
> > > > libraries it would download BE binaries where it actually should
> > > > download LE binaries. Example for os.arch/java.library.path:
> > > >
> > > > pre:
> > > > $ ./jdk8-pre-ppc64le/bin/java TestProperty
> > > > java.library.path =
> >
> > /usr/java/packages/lib/ppc64:/usr/lib64:/lib64:/lib:/usr/lib
> > > > os.arch = ppc64
> > > >
> > > > post:
> > > > $ ./jdk8-post-ppc64le/bin/java TestProperty
> > > > java.library.path =
> >
> > /usr/java/packages/lib/ppc64le:/usr/lib64:/lib64:/lib:/usr/lib
> > > > os.arch = ppc64le
> > > >
> > > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073139
> > > > webrevs: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-
> >
> > 8073139/jdk8/01/
> > > >
> > > > Including build-dev for build changes. hotspot-dev and ppc-aix-port-dev
> > > > for JDK/hotspot changes.
> > > >
> > > > This backport should only have minor differences to the changes in JDK
> > > > 11. We have been using similar patches in Fedora for months. Thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Severin
> > > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
More information about the ppc-aix-port-dev
mailing list