issues with getting started...
Ray Kiddy
ray at ganymede.org
Sun Dec 27 12:06:56 PST 2009
Hello -
I hate posting newbie-ishly, but I cannot avoid it in this case. I am
having problems with some things that seem really, really basic. I
have tried to read the available docs. Some links to testing articles
on java.net have gone stale. Others seem to leave steps out. For
example, I have tried to follow the steps in http://openjdk.java.net/groups/conformance/docs/JCK6bUsersGuide/html/p13.html
.
This may sound stupid, but I am having problem seeing how a test suite
is identified. If I launch javatest, it asks me which suite I want to
run. Is a suite identified by implementing an interface, or sub-
classing some class? If so, I cannot find it. The UI would suggest
there is a suffix and a file type that identifies test suites. Or
else, how would the picker identify one? Using the file browser to
randomly find something that is acceptable as a test suite has not
worked.
Is there a wiki page somewhere that describes the testing effort? I
did a search from a page on the OpenJDK wiki (http://wikis.sun.com/dosearchsite.action?queryString=test
), and I got these results:
# test-test (test-test)
# Test_Test (test_test)
# .test. (.test.)
# testes (testes)
# test (test)
...
Not helpful. Paging through the rest of the results of this search
does not seem to bring one to anything useful. It seems that the
testing effort which is presumably going on within Sun has not yet
been given very much outside visibility. Or I am missing something
obvious, which is completely possible.
I can build OpenJDK 7 on Mac OS X, and I am interested in seeing how
the tests can be run on this platform. I also have the VM build on an
Ubuntu system, but identifying a test suite is not any more obvious on
any other platform. Really, I am sure I am missing something which may
be obvious to many. I often come to things with, shall we say, a
"unique" perspective. But not seeing something "obvious" can be useful
and I often find that assumptions inherent in a process can be better
documented. It would be especially helpful if the documentation was on
a wki.
Any suggestions?
I have been working with java for quite a while. For example, I was in
the WebObjects team at Apple for almost 10 years and was there while
WO was being ported to java. I have some ideas for testing the VM that
might be interesting. But I obviously do not yet understand something
basic about the approach you all are taking. So, we'll see.
thanx - ray
More information about the quality-discuss
mailing list