Code Coverage

Martijn Verburg martijnverburg at gmail.com
Tue May 28 10:29:49 PDT 2013


Hi Pavel,

As part of Betterrev we'll be providing some public hosting, we're still a
few weeks from going live, but it shouldn't be too far away.  We could then
provide a place to host these results on that server.

Cheers,
Martijn


On 28 May 2013 13:55, Pavel Tisnovsky <ptisnovs at redhat.com> wrote:

>
> ----- Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Pavel,
> >
> > That would be fantastic. The place we're combining all the workflow for
> > submitting patches to OpenJDK is the Betterrev project -->
> > https://bitbucket.org/adoptopenjdk/betterrev.  Also see
> > adoptopenjdk.java.net for the mailing list and IRC details.
> >
>
> Hi Martijn,
>
> thank you very much for the info mentioned above.
> What should I do to present Mauve code coverage results somewhere publicly
> available?
>
> Cheers,
> Pavel
>
> > Cheers,
> > Martijn
> >
> >
> > On 24 May 2013 16:37, Pavel Tisnovsky <ptisnovs at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Richard,
> > >
> > > FYI: we are running many form of tests against OpenJDK internally in
> Red
> > > Hat.
> > > ATM our focus is to improve especially Mauve tests to have better
> coverage
> > > of all Java SE API classes.
> > > I'm also measuring test code coverage using JaCoCo and my own JVM TI
> based
> > > tool which is
> > > able to check code coverage on basic classes (where JaCoCo can't be
> used).
> > > All results
> > > are generated in HTML form + some graphs etc. etc.
> > >
> > > It would be perfect to have one (public) place to publish those
> results,
> > > so it would be nice to cooperate on this topic if you want to :)
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Pavel Tisnovsky
> > > Red Hat
> > >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/quality-discuss/attachments/20130528/7e4a78d3/attachment.html 


More information about the quality-discuss mailing list