We have some Code Coverage results from JCov/JTreg!

[Martijn Verburg]

Sadly I may not be able to make FOSDEM, still trying to wrangle some clever
ways to make it.

Cheers,
Martijn

On 19 January 2015 at 17:33, Rory O'Donnell <rory.odonnell at oracle.com>
wrote:

>
> On 19/01/2015 17:28, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>
> Hi Rory,
>
>  Understood - it will be good to be able to encourage various OpenJDK
> members to contribute / port tests into it and measure that. Small steps
> :-).
>
> Sounds good Martijn, talk more on this at FOSDEM ?
>
> Rgds,Rory
>
>
>  On 19 January 2015 at 16:35, Rory O'Donnell <rory.odonnell at oracle.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 19/01/2015 15:36, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rory,
>>
>>  Thanks - we're looking into the existing Cloudbees Jenkins instance to
>> do this.
>>
>>  ok
>>
>>  A second question quick question - do the numbers we're publishing look
>> right compared to your internal ones?
>>
>>   Appreciate non OpenJDK tests run by Oracle means that they cover more.
>>
>>
>>   Comparing our internal numbers with yours would be like comparing
>> apples with pears
>> I'm afraid.
>>
>> Rgds,Rory
>>
>>   Cheers,
>> Martijn
>>
>> On 19 January 2015 at 15:18, Rory O'Donnell <rory.odonnell at oracle.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 19/01/2015 10:55, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> John Oliver and Mani Sarkar spent some time on the most recent Adopt
>>>> OpenJDK hackday and managed to get what looks like to be meaningful code
>>>> coverage numbers for OpenJDK using the jcov/jtreg tools:
>>>>
>>>> Results for jdk9: http://sticky.uwcs.co.uk/jcov/
>>>>
>>>> ========Code Tools Dev========
>>>>
>>>> The configuration John used was as follows (is this the correct usage
>>>> pattern?):
>>>>
>>>> Build jdk images
>>>> install jtreg with the jcov
>>>>
>>>> export the normal vars:
>>>>
>>>> ```
>>>> export SOURCE_CODE=/home/joliver/workspace/jdk9/
>>>> export JTREG_INSTALL=/home/joliver/workspace/jtreg
>>>> export JT_HOME=$JTREG_INSTALL
>>>> export JTREG_HOME=$JTREG_INSTALL
>>>> export
>>>> PRODUCT_HOME=$SOURCE_CODE/build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-release/images/jdk
>>>>
>>>> export JPRT_JTREG_HOME=${JT_HOME}
>>>> export JPRT_JAVA_HOME=${PRODUCT_HOME}
>>>> export JTREG_TIMEOUT_FACTOR=5
>>>> export CONCURRENCY=8
>>>> ```
>>>>
>>>> cd into jdk/test
>>>>
>>>> edit the Makefile and add the following:
>>>>
>>>> ```
>>>> jdkroot=/home/joliver/workspace/jdk9/
>>>>
>>>> JTREG_TEST_OPTIONS +=
>>>> -jcov/classes:$(jdkroot)/build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-release/jdk/modules/java.base
>>>> JTREG_TEST_OPTIONS +=
>>>> -jcov/source:$(jdkroot)/jdk/src/java.base/share/classes
>>>> JTREG_TEST_OPTIONS += -jcov/include:*
>>>> ```
>>>>
>>>> just before the line: # Make sure jtreg exists
>>>>
>>>> then just run "make test" inside the root
>>>>
>>>> =======Quality Discuss=======
>>>>
>>>  Hi Martijn,
>>>
>>> Posting the results on our wiki won't work, so I can provide a link to
>>> the
>>> results. Let me know when  you have decided on the link locations.
>>>
>>> Rgds,Rory
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is this something that could be hosted by the quality group for the
>>>> major OpenJDK code lines (7u, 8u and jdk9)?
>>>>
>>>> If not then the Adoption Group can host it on one of their external
>>>> servers temporarily and we could link to that from the wiki(s)/project
>>>> page(s).
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Martijn
>>>>
>>>
>>>   --
>>> Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
>>> Quality Engineering Manager
>>> Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
>> Quality Engineering Manager
>> Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland
>>
>>
>
> --
> Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
> Quality Engineering Manager
> Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/quality-discuss/attachments/20150119/34a8b91f/attachment-0001.html>