JCov and coverage numbers on OpenJDK

Martijn Verburg martijnverburg at gmail.com
Tue Mar 3 11:13:42 UTC 2015



On 3 March 2015 at 10:45, Rory O'Donnell <rory.odonnell at oracle.com> wrote:

> Hi Martijn,
> Can you send out a link to the lastest results ?
> Tuesday, will work for me, checking if Balchandra is available.
> Rgds,Rory
> On 03/03/2015 10:32, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> As some of you know we've been running some experiments in the Cloudbees
>> incubator to see if we can get accurate code coverage numbers using JCov
>> on
>> the jdk9 forest in particular.
>> John Oliver has gone back and reviewed the process and the numbers and we
>> *think* we've gone about it the right way.
>> Before we even think about taking the next step to start producing these
>> numbers regularly in the incubator, we need to make sure that we've used
>> JCov correctly and that the numbers are not misleading.
>> It would be great to have a technical call with John Oliver, Mani, someone
>> from Rory's team (the person who does the internal OpenJDK numbers?) and
>> probably Jonathan Gibbons.
>> Does next Tuesday suit folks?  It all depends on timezones (John Oliver,
>> Mani and myself are GMT)
>> Cheers,
>> Martijn
> --
> Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
> Quality Engineering Manager
> Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/quality-discuss/attachments/20150303/51a4d9d8/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the quality-discuss mailing list