What bug does JDK-8168389 duplicate?

[Vitaly Provodin]

Hi Rory,

Now it is accessed. But the  issue JDK-8168389 has resolution=‘Cannot Reproduce’ for now, before it was ‘Duplicate’
Is that correct?

Thanks,
Vitaly

> On 21 Dec 2016, at 21:10, Rory O'Donnell <rory.odonnell at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Vitaly,
> 
> You should be able to view the bug now, I am still looking into it.
> Rgds,Rory
> 
> On 21/12/2016 10:26, Vitaly Provodin wrote:
>> Ooops. I do not have an access to JDK-8072110 - Bug System requires me to log in (but I do not have an account yet)
>> Does the issue JDK-8072110 have some restrictions?
>> 
>>> On 21 Dec 2016, at 17:21, Rory O'Donnell <rory.odonnell at oracle.com <mailto:rory.odonnell at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Vitaly,
>>> 
>>> I will look into this, the duplicate bug is JDK-8072110 - which was closed as "will not fix".
>>> 
>>> I will look into this further, but at this time of year it may take some time.
>>> 
>>> Rgds,Rory
>>> 
>>> On 21/12/2016 04:25, Vitaly Provodin wrote:
>>>> Good time of day
>>>> 
>>>> Recently I detected that the issue https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8168389 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8168389> was closed as duplicate but there are no information about original bug.
>>>> Could you pleas provide information about what bug was duplicated by JDK-8168389 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8168389>?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Vitaly
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
>>> Quality Engineering Manager
>>> Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
> Quality Engineering Manager
> Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/quality-discuss/attachments/20161222/11da00ee/attachment-0001.html>