What bug does JDK-8168389 duplicate?

[Rory O'Donnell]

Hi Vitaly,

On 22/12/2016 02:25, Vitaly Provodin wrote:
> Hi Rory,
>
> Now it is accessed. But the  issue JDK-8168389 has resolution=‘Cannot 
> Reproduce’ for now, before it was ‘Duplicate’
> Is that correct?
This is reproducible on WIndows, will get the bug updated later today.

Rgds,Rory
>
> Thanks,
> Vitaly
>
>> On 21 Dec 2016, at 21:10, Rory O'Donnell <rory.odonnell at oracle.com 
>> <mailto:rory.odonnell at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Vitaly,
>>
>> You should be able to view the bug now, I am still looking into it.
>>
>> Rgds,Rory
>>
>>
>> On 21/12/2016 10:26, Vitaly Provodin wrote:
>>> Ooops. I do not have an access to JDK-8072110 - Bug System requires 
>>> me to log in (but I do not have an account yet)
>>> Does the issue JDK-8072110 have some restrictions?
>>>
>>>> On 21 Dec 2016, at 17:21, Rory O'Donnell <rory.odonnell at oracle.com 
>>>> <mailto:rory.odonnell at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Vitaly,
>>>>
>>>> I will look into this, the duplicate bug is JDK-8072110 - which was 
>>>> closed as "will not fix".
>>>>
>>>> I will look into this further, but at this time of year it may take 
>>>> some time.
>>>>
>>>> Rgds,Rory
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 21/12/2016 04:25, Vitaly Provodin wrote:
>>>>> Good time of day
>>>>>
>>>>> Recently I detected that the issue 
>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8168389 was closed as 
>>>>> duplicate but there are no information about original bug.
>>>>> Could you pleas provide information about what bug was duplicated 
>>>>> by JDK-8168389 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8168389>?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Vitaly
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
>>>> Quality Engineering Manager
>>>> Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
>> Quality Engineering Manager
>> Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland
>

-- 
Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
Quality Engineering Manager
Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/quality-discuss/attachments/20161222/8b4fcf06/attachment-0001.html>