jdk-9-ea+157_windows-x64_bin.exe is reported as virus/malware by Firefox and Chrome

Rory O'Donnell rory.odonnell at oracle.com
Tue Mar 7 08:37:19 UTC 2017


Thank you Reto & Luke for confirming the issue is resolved.

Rgds,Rory


On 06/03/2017 22:28, Reto Merz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Yes I can confirm that Windows 64-bit installer Java 9 b157, b158, b159
> and also Java 8 EA u152 is no longer reported as virus/malware
> by Firefox 51.0.1 (32-Bit) and Chrome 56.0.2924.87 (64-bit).
>
> Thanks
> Reto
>
>
> *Von: * Luke U <ldubox-coding101 at yahoo.co.uk>
> *An: * <quality-discuss at openjdk.java.net>
> *Gesendet: * 06.03.2017 23:11
> *Betreff: * Re: jdk-9-ea+157_windows-x64_bin.exe is reported as 
> virus/malware by Firefox and Chrome
>
>     > Hi Reto,
>     >
>     > I understand this issue has been resolved, the Safe Browsing
>     mechanism
>     > seems to have been updated,
>     >
>     > can you confirm ?
>     >
>     > Rgds,Rory
>
>     Hi, I'd been watching this thread also. (Hoping for some
>     confirmation of
>     'false positive' as I'm keen to test recent HiDPI fixes.)
>
>     I can confirm here that:
>
>     Previously 64-bit installers of ea157, ea158 and ea159 had all
>     triggered the
>     virus warning in Firefox, tested across 2 separate computers. (Whilst
>     Windows Defender had no problem with it.)
>
>     Today Firefox (52.0 64-bit Beta) let me download
>     jdk-9-ea+159_windows-x64_bin.exe without complaint.
>
>     Regards,
>     Luke
>
>
>
>
>     -- 
>     View this message in context:
>     http://openjdk.5641.n7.nabble.com/jdk-9-ea-157-windows-x64-bin-exe-is-reported-as-virus-malware-by-Firefox-and-Chrome-tp299991p300530.html
>     Sent from the OpenJDK Quality Discussion mailing list archive at
>     Nabble.com.
>

-- 
Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
Quality Engineering Manager
Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/quality-discuss/attachments/20170307/3b727016/attachment.html>


More information about the quality-discuss mailing list