From abdul.kolarkunnu at oracle.com Mon Nov 6 10:29:32 2017 From: abdul.kolarkunnu at oracle.com (Muneer Kolarkunnu) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 02:29:32 -0800 (PST) Subject: JDK 10 b29 Early Access is available on jdk.java.net Message-ID: <2b38add9-916f-459d-84b8-b5c41f80a0b7@default> Hi All, JDK 10 Early Access? build 29 is available at : - jdk.java.net/10/ JDK 10 Early Access Release Notes are available [1] JDK 10 Schedule, Status & Features are available [2] Notes OpenJDK EA binaries will be available at a later date. Oracle has proposed: Newer version-string scheme for the Java SE Platform and the JDK Please see Mark Reinhold's proposal [3] , feedback via the mailing list to Mark please. Feedback - If you have suggestions or encounter bugs, please submit them using the usual Java SE bug-reporting channel. Be sure to include complete version information from the output of the java --version command. [1] http://jdk.java.net/10/release-notes [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/10/ [3] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-dev/2017-November/000089.html -- Regards, Abdul Muneer Kolarkunnu Quality Engineer Oracle, Bangalore, India ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Thu Nov 16 19:04:21 2017 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 20:04:21 +0100 Subject: Oracle JDK 9 Update Plans, JDK 10 EA Builds and more OpenJDK Quality Outreach Message-ID: <0d9e50d3-285e-273c-f3a5-ab1184519c34@oracle.com> Hi, Please see http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/2017-November/000024.html for Oracle's plans for contributing to JDK 9 updates in OpenJDK. Developers can already start testing their code with JDK 10 Early Access builds from http://jdk.java.net/10/, 5 months ahead of the planned GA date of JDK 10, or their own OpenJDK builds, of course. Many thanks to those open source developers that have already started testing their projects with JDK 10, such as the developers working on JUnit, Apache Lucene and Hibernate, and in particular to the developers of projects already getting updated to work well with JDK 10, such as ByteBuddy and Apache Commons Lang. Finally, with the begin of a new JDK early access build cycle, we're also looking to add more such open source projects to the OpenJDK Quality Outreach effort. If you are a lead or core developer on a popular open source project, please join us on the quality-discuss mailing list (cc:ed), and ask to have your FOSS project added to the growing list at https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/quality/Quality+Outreach cheers, dalibor topic -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From abdul.kolarkunnu at oracle.com Tue Nov 21 05:03:14 2017 From: abdul.kolarkunnu at oracle.com (Muneer Kolarkunnu) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 21:03:14 -0800 (PST) Subject: JDK 8u162 b03 test results now available Message-ID: <3d324070-0b25-4aed-bfb2-7f7ff3570464@default> JDK 8u162 ea b03 test results are now available at http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/8/testresults.html The jdk test results contain 9 differences from the build b01 test results. There is 1 testcase failure, this failure is under investigation, JBS issue already exists for this failure. 0: /export/home/gtee/muneer/jtest/merge8/jdk8u162-b01/jdk/JTwork pass: 5,096; fail: 16; not run: 1,134 1: /export/home/gtee/muneer/jtest/merge8/jdk8u162-b03/jdk/JTwork pass: 5,103; fail: 16; not run: 1,137 0 1 Test pass fail com/sun/nio/sctp/SctpChannel/SocketOptionTests.java fail pass com/sun/tools/attach/StartManagementAgent.java --- pass sun/security/krb5/auto/TicketSName.java --- pass sun/security/pkcs11/Config/ReadConfInUTF16Env.sh --- pass sun/security/provider/DSA/TestLegacyDSAKeyPairGenerator.java --- pass sun/security/tools/jarsigner/DefaultSigalg.java --- pass sun/security/tools/keytool/WeakAlg.java --- pass sun/security/tools/keytool/keyalg.sh --- pass sun/security/util/Pem/encoding.sh 9 differences The hotspot test results contain 3 differences from the build b01 test results. There are 3 testcase failures, these failures are under investigation, JBS issue already exists for this failure. 0: /export/home/gtee/muneer/jtest/merge8/jdk8u162-b01/hotspot/JTwork pass: 671; fail: 40; error: 4; not run: 21 1: /export/home/gtee/muneer/jtest/merge8/jdk8u162-b03/hotspot/JTwork pass: 668; fail: 43; error: 4; not run: 21 0 1 Test pass fail gc/g1/TestShrinkAuxiliaryData15.java pass fail gc/g1/TestShrinkAuxiliaryData20.java pass fail gc/g1/TestShrinkAuxiliaryData25.java 3 differences The langtools test results contain 3 differences from the build b01 test results. No new testcase failures found. 0: /export/home/gtee/muneer/jtest/merge8/jdk8u162-b01/langtools/JTwork pass: 3,110; fail: 2; not run: 10 1: /export/home/gtee/muneer/jtest/merge8/jdk8u162-b03/langtools/JTwork pass: 3,113; fail: 2; not run: 7 0 1 Test --- pass tools/javac/policy/test1/Test1a.java#id0 --- pass tools/javac/policy/test1/Test1b.java#id0 --- pass tools/javac/policy/test2/Test.java#id0 3 differences The nashorn test result is available at http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/8/archives8/jdk8u162-b03/emailable-report.html -- Regards, Abdul Muneer Quality Engineer Oracle, Bangalore, India -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From martijnverburg at gmail.com Tue Nov 21 21:01:26 2017 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 21:01:26 +0000 Subject: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available In-Reply-To: References: <36e8ae68-e1df-498a-a946-09625885d288@default> <6110c2df-16b0-d321-84a0-cc3803ba3421@oracle.com> Message-ID: To complete this old thread, We now have a build farm at https://ci.adoptpenjdk.net with a corresponding website at https://www.adoptopenjdk.net and all of the supporting repos at https://www.github.com/adoptopenjdk If you'd like to join the community Slack or GitHub and get a walkthrough, please let me know! Cheers, Martijn On 19 January 2017 at 22:12, Martijn Verburg wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm partly on holiday this week but will get back to all of you with the > straw man we had come up with a few FOSDEM's ago on how we could tackle this > > Cheers, > Martijn > > On 17 January 2017 at 21:49, Jonathan Gibbons > wrote: > >> If someone can collect the different sets of jtreg output, there's a >> related utility called "jtdiff" that can be used to generate combined >> reports. It can compare either full work directories, or the >> report/text/summary.txt files. The latter may be sufficient in this case. >> >> -- Jon >> >> >> >> On 1/16/17 3:54 AM, Stuart Monteith wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> I'm Stuart Monteith in Linaro, working on OpenJDK on ARM's 64-bit >>> Aarch64 platform. We currently publish aarch64 testing results to the >>> aarch64-port-dev mailing list and host results on >>> http://openjdk.linaro.org/ . What I would find useful would be a means >>> to collate results across all the platforms, with perhaps a method to >>> collate results from separate build farms. I'm sure a common set formats >>> for presentation could be agreed upon. Knowing that a change in, say, >>> x86, breaks arm, aarch64, ppc64, s390x would be useful for everyone. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Stuart >>> >>> >>> On 15/01/17 13:07, Martijn Verburg wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> The LJC has plans to do this with a small build farm for some of the >>>> more common platforms. This will be for R&D and academic research >>>> purposes only. >>>> >>>> If you have OpenJDK / Jenkins build experience and would like to help >>>> then please let me know! >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Martijn >>>> >>>> On 13 January 2017 at 20:50, dalibor topic >>> > wrote: >>>> >>>> On 12.01.2017 20:51, Martin Buchholz wrote: >>>> >>>> Oracle runs tests on many platforms; why does this report only >>>> include >>>> one platform? >>>> >>>> >>>> It would be rather nice to see more people run the OpenJDK jtreg >>>> tests on their own OpenJDK builds on platforms of their choice and >>>> post the results regularly. >>>> >>>> The great thing about these tests is that it doesn't have to be >>>> someone at Oracle doing all the running and all the posting. >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> dalibor topic >>>> -- >>>> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager >>>> Phone: +494089091214 >>> > | Mobile: +491737185961 >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg >>>> >>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG >>>> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen >>>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 >>>> >>>> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. >>>> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande >>>> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 >>>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher >>>> >>>> >>> > Oracle is committed to >>>> developing >>>> practices and products that help protect the environment >>>> >>>> >>>> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Wed Nov 22 13:35:52 2017 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 14:35:52 +0100 Subject: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available In-Reply-To: References: <36e8ae68-e1df-498a-a946-09625885d288@default> <6110c2df-16b0-d321-84a0-cc3803ba3421@oracle.com> Message-ID: <8623bf50-8765-8751-1f6b-770a2cdfddf1@oracle.com> Thanks, Martijn - the relevant link for the test results is at https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/OpenJDK%20tests/ . It'd be nice if someone from LJC or IBM would post a link/summary of the test results regularly to this list as well. cheers, dalibor topic On 21.11.2017 22:01, Martijn Verburg wrote: > To complete this old thread, > > We now have a build farm at https://ci.adoptpenjdk.net with a > corresponding website at https://www.adoptopenjdk.net and all of the > supporting repos at https://www.github.com/adoptopenjdk > > If you'd like to join the community Slack or GitHub and get a > walkthrough, please let me know! > > Cheers, > Martijn > > On 19 January 2017 at 22:12, Martijn Verburg > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm partly on holiday this week but will get back to all of you with > the straw man we had come up with a few FOSDEM's ago on how we could > tackle this > > Cheers, > Martijn > > On 17 January 2017 at 21:49, Jonathan Gibbons > > > wrote: > > If someone can collect the different sets of jtreg output, > there's a related utility called "jtdiff" that can be used to > generate combined reports.? It can compare either full work > directories, or the report/text/summary.txt files. The latter > may be sufficient in this case. > > -- Jon > > > > On 1/16/17 3:54 AM, Stuart Monteith wrote: > > Hello, > ? ? ? ? I'm Stuart Monteith in Linaro, working on OpenJDK > on ARM's 64-bit > Aarch64 platform. We currently publish aarch64 testing > results to the > aarch64-port-dev mailing list and host results on > http://openjdk.linaro.org/ . What I would find useful would > be a means > to collate results across all the platforms, with perhaps a > method to > collate results from separate build farms. I'm sure a common > set formats > for presentation could be agreed upon. Knowing that a change > in, say, > x86, breaks arm, aarch64, ppc64, s390x would be useful for > everyone. > > Best regards, > ? ? Stuart > > > On 15/01/17 13:07, Martijn Verburg wrote: > > Hi all, > > The LJC has plans to do this with a small build farm for > some of the > more common platforms.? This will be for R&D and > academic research > purposes only. > > If you have OpenJDK / Jenkins build experience and would > like to help > then please let me know! > > Cheers, > Martijn > > On 13 January 2017 at 20:50, dalibor topic > > >> wrote: > > ? ? ?On 12.01.2017 20:51, Martin Buchholz wrote: > > ? ? ? ? ?Oracle runs tests on many platforms; why does > this report only > ? ? ? ? ?include > ? ? ? ? ?one platform? > > > ? ? ?It would be rather nice to see more people run the > OpenJDK jtreg > ? ? ?tests on their own OpenJDK builds on platforms of > their choice and > ? ? ?post the results regularly. > > ? ? ?The great thing about these tests is that it > doesn't have to be > ? ? ?someone at Oracle doing all the running and all > the posting. > > ? ? ?cheers, > ? ? ?dalibor topic > ? ? ?-- > ? ? ? Dalibor Topic | Principal > Product Manager > ? ? ?Phone: +494089091214 > > ? ? ?> | Mobile: +491737185961 > > ? ? ? > > > > ? ? ?ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | > 22761 Hamburg > > ? ? ?ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG > ? ? ?Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen > ? ? ?Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 > > ? ? ?Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. > ? ? ?Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande > ? ? ?Handelsregister der Handelskammer > Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 > ? ? ?Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan > Schultheiss, Val Maher > > ? ? ? > ? ? ? >> Oracle is committed > to developing > ? ? ?practices and products that help protect the > environment > > > > > -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From martijnverburg at gmail.com Wed Nov 22 20:44:51 2017 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 20:44:51 +0000 Subject: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available In-Reply-To: <8623bf50-8765-8751-1f6b-770a2cdfddf1@oracle.com> References: <36e8ae68-e1df-498a-a946-09625885d288@default> <6110c2df-16b0-d321-84a0-cc3803ba3421@oracle.com> <8623bf50-8765-8751-1f6b-770a2cdfddf1@oracle.com> Message-ID: Hi Dalibor, That's a really good idea. Any objections to having an automated system sign up to this mailing list and posting on a regular schedule? Cheers, Martijn On 22 November 2017 at 13:35, dalibor topic wrote: > Thanks, Martijn - the relevant link for the test results is at > https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/OpenJDK%20tests/ . > > It'd be nice if someone from LJC or IBM would post a link/summary of the > test results regularly to this list as well. > > cheers, > dalibor topic > > On 21.11.2017 22:01, Martijn Verburg wrote: > >> To complete this old thread, >> >> We now have a build farm at https://ci.adoptpenjdk.net with a >> corresponding website at https://www.adoptopenjdk.net and all of the >> supporting repos at https://www.github.com/adoptopenjdk >> >> If you'd like to join the community Slack or GitHub and get a >> walkthrough, please let me know! >> >> Cheers, >> Martijn >> >> On 19 January 2017 at 22:12, Martijn Verburg > > wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'm partly on holiday this week but will get back to all of you with >> the straw man we had come up with a few FOSDEM's ago on how we could >> tackle this >> >> Cheers, >> Martijn >> >> On 17 January 2017 at 21:49, Jonathan Gibbons >> > >> wrote: >> >> If someone can collect the different sets of jtreg output, >> there's a related utility called "jtdiff" that can be used to >> generate combined reports. It can compare either full work >> directories, or the report/text/summary.txt files. The latter >> may be sufficient in this case. >> >> -- Jon >> >> >> >> On 1/16/17 3:54 AM, Stuart Monteith wrote: >> >> Hello, >> I'm Stuart Monteith in Linaro, working on OpenJDK >> on ARM's 64-bit >> Aarch64 platform. We currently publish aarch64 testing >> results to the >> aarch64-port-dev mailing list and host results on >> http://openjdk.linaro.org/ . What I would find useful would >> be a means >> to collate results across all the platforms, with perhaps a >> method to >> collate results from separate build farms. I'm sure a common >> set formats >> for presentation could be agreed upon. Knowing that a change >> in, say, >> x86, breaks arm, aarch64, ppc64, s390x would be useful for >> everyone. >> >> Best regards, >> Stuart >> >> >> On 15/01/17 13:07, Martijn Verburg wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> The LJC has plans to do this with a small build farm for >> some of the >> more common platforms. This will be for R&D and >> academic research >> purposes only. >> >> If you have OpenJDK / Jenkins build experience and would >> like to help >> then please let me know! >> >> Cheers, >> Martijn >> >> On 13 January 2017 at 20:50, dalibor topic >> > om> >> > >> wrote: >> >> On 12.01.2017 20:51, Martin Buchholz wrote: >> >> Oracle runs tests on many platforms; why does >> this report only >> include >> one platform? >> >> >> It would be rather nice to see more people run the >> OpenJDK jtreg >> tests on their own OpenJDK builds on platforms of >> their choice and >> post the results regularly. >> >> The great thing about these tests is that it >> doesn't have to be >> someone at Oracle doing all the running and all >> the posting. >> >> cheers, >> dalibor topic >> -- >> Dalibor Topic | Principal >> Product Manager >> Phone: +494089091214 >> > >> > | Mobile: +491737185961 >> >> >> > >> >> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | >> 22761 Hamburg >> >> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG >> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen >> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 >> >> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. >> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, >> Niederlande >> Handelsregister der Handelskammer >> Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 >> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan >> Schultheiss, Val Maher >> >> > >> > >> Oracle is committed >> to developing >> practices and products that help protect the >> environment >> >> >> >> >> >> > -- > Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager > Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 > > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG > Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen > Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 > > Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. > Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande > Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher > > Oracle is committed to developing > practices and products that help protect the environment > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From volker.simonis at gmail.com Thu Nov 23 08:10:15 2017 From: volker.simonis at gmail.com (Volker Simonis) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:10:15 +0100 Subject: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available In-Reply-To: References: <36e8ae68-e1df-498a-a946-09625885d288@default> <6110c2df-16b0-d321-84a0-cc3803ba3421@oracle.com> <8623bf50-8765-8751-1f6b-770a2cdfddf1@oracle.com> Message-ID: Hi Dalibor, could you please update: http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/10/docs/howtoruntests.html to conform to the latest, consolidated repository. The description still refers to the various sub-repos (jdk/test, hotspot/test, etc..) which are gone now. Thank you and best regards, Volker On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote: > Hi Dalibor, > > That's a really good idea. Any objections to having an automated system > sign up to this mailing list and posting on a regular schedule? > > Cheers, > Martijn > > On 22 November 2017 at 13:35, dalibor topic > wrote: >> >> Thanks, Martijn - the relevant link for the test results is at >> https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/OpenJDK%20tests/ . >> >> It'd be nice if someone from LJC or IBM would post a link/summary of the >> test results regularly to this list as well. >> >> cheers, >> dalibor topic >> >> On 21.11.2017 22:01, Martijn Verburg wrote: >>> >>> To complete this old thread, >>> >>> We now have a build farm at https://ci.adoptpenjdk.net with a >>> corresponding website at https://www.adoptopenjdk.net and all of the >>> supporting repos at https://www.github.com/adoptopenjdk >>> >>> If you'd like to join the community Slack or GitHub and get a >>> walkthrough, please let me know! >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Martijn >>> >>> On 19 January 2017 at 22:12, Martijn Verburg >> > wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'm partly on holiday this week but will get back to all of you with >>> the straw man we had come up with a few FOSDEM's ago on how we could >>> tackle this >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Martijn >>> >>> On 17 January 2017 at 21:49, Jonathan Gibbons >>> > >>> wrote: >>> >>> If someone can collect the different sets of jtreg output, >>> there's a related utility called "jtdiff" that can be used to >>> generate combined reports. It can compare either full work >>> directories, or the report/text/summary.txt files. The latter >>> may be sufficient in this case. >>> >>> -- Jon >>> >>> >>> >>> On 1/16/17 3:54 AM, Stuart Monteith wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> I'm Stuart Monteith in Linaro, working on OpenJDK >>> on ARM's 64-bit >>> Aarch64 platform. We currently publish aarch64 testing >>> results to the >>> aarch64-port-dev mailing list and host results on >>> http://openjdk.linaro.org/ . What I would find useful would >>> be a means >>> to collate results across all the platforms, with perhaps a >>> method to >>> collate results from separate build farms. I'm sure a common >>> set formats >>> for presentation could be agreed upon. Knowing that a change >>> in, say, >>> x86, breaks arm, aarch64, ppc64, s390x would be useful for >>> everyone. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Stuart >>> >>> >>> On 15/01/17 13:07, Martijn Verburg wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> The LJC has plans to do this with a small build farm for >>> some of the >>> more common platforms. This will be for R&D and >>> academic research >>> purposes only. >>> >>> If you have OpenJDK / Jenkins build experience and would >>> like to help >>> then please let me know! >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Martijn >>> >>> On 13 January 2017 at 20:50, dalibor topic >>> >> >>> >> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 12.01.2017 20:51, Martin Buchholz wrote: >>> >>> Oracle runs tests on many platforms; why does >>> this report only >>> include >>> one platform? >>> >>> >>> It would be rather nice to see more people run the >>> OpenJDK jtreg >>> tests on their own OpenJDK builds on platforms of >>> their choice and >>> post the results regularly. >>> >>> The great thing about these tests is that it >>> doesn't have to be >>> someone at Oracle doing all the running and all >>> the posting. >>> >>> cheers, >>> dalibor topic >>> -- >>> Dalibor Topic | Principal >>> Product Manager >>> Phone: +494089091214 >>> >> >>> > | Mobile: +491737185961 >>> >>> >>> > >>> >>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | >>> 22761 Hamburg >>> >>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG >>> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen >>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 >>> >>> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. >>> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, >>> Niederlande >>> Handelsregister der Handelskammer >>> Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 >>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan >>> Schultheiss, Val Maher >>> >>> >> >>> >> >> Oracle is committed >>> to developing >>> practices and products that help protect the >>> environment >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager >> Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 >> >> >> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg >> >> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG >> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen >> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 >> >> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. >> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande >> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 >> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher >> >> Oracle is committed to developing >> practices and products that help protect the environment > > From rory.odonnell at oracle.com Thu Nov 23 08:34:21 2017 From: rory.odonnell at oracle.com (Rory O'Donnell) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:34:21 +0000 Subject: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available In-Reply-To: References: <36e8ae68-e1df-498a-a946-09625885d288@default> <6110c2df-16b0-d321-84a0-cc3803ba3421@oracle.com> <8623bf50-8765-8751-1f6b-770a2cdfddf1@oracle.com> Message-ID: <75609073-0360-0ce9-ab4b-6815f73ca46a@oracle.com> Volker, We added Note 3 to http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/10/ earlier this week, we should have updated the "howto" also, will get that done shortly. We are still evaluating the most suitable hotspot test group(s), bear with us while we get this sorted. Rgds,Rory On 23/11/2017 08:10, Volker Simonis wrote: > Hi Dalibor, > > could you please update: > > http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/10/docs/howtoruntests.html > > to conform to the latest, consolidated repository. The description > still refers to the various sub-repos (jdk/test, hotspot/test, etc..) > which are gone now. > > Thank you and best regards, > Volker > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Martijn Verburg > wrote: >> Hi Dalibor, >> >> That's a really good idea. Any objections to having an automated system >> sign up to this mailing list and posting on a regular schedule? >> >> Cheers, >> Martijn >> >> On 22 November 2017 at 13:35, dalibor topic >> wrote: >>> Thanks, Martijn - the relevant link for the test results is at >>> https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/OpenJDK%20tests/ . >>> >>> It'd be nice if someone from LJC or IBM would post a link/summary of the >>> test results regularly to this list as well. >>> >>> cheers, >>> dalibor topic >>> >>> On 21.11.2017 22:01, Martijn Verburg wrote: >>>> To complete this old thread, >>>> >>>> We now have a build farm at https://ci.adoptpenjdk.net with a >>>> corresponding website at https://www.adoptopenjdk.net and all of the >>>> supporting repos at https://www.github.com/adoptopenjdk >>>> >>>> If you'd like to join the community Slack or GitHub and get a >>>> walkthrough, please let me know! >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Martijn >>>> >>>> On 19 January 2017 at 22:12, Martijn Verburg >>> > wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I'm partly on holiday this week but will get back to all of you with >>>> the straw man we had come up with a few FOSDEM's ago on how we could >>>> tackle this >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Martijn >>>> >>>> On 17 January 2017 at 21:49, Jonathan Gibbons >>>> > >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> If someone can collect the different sets of jtreg output, >>>> there's a related utility called "jtdiff" that can be used to >>>> generate combined reports. It can compare either full work >>>> directories, or the report/text/summary.txt files. The latter >>>> may be sufficient in this case. >>>> >>>> -- Jon >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 1/16/17 3:54 AM, Stuart Monteith wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> I'm Stuart Monteith in Linaro, working on OpenJDK >>>> on ARM's 64-bit >>>> Aarch64 platform. We currently publish aarch64 testing >>>> results to the >>>> aarch64-port-dev mailing list and host results on >>>> http://openjdk.linaro.org/ . What I would find useful would >>>> be a means >>>> to collate results across all the platforms, with perhaps a >>>> method to >>>> collate results from separate build farms. I'm sure a common >>>> set formats >>>> for presentation could be agreed upon. Knowing that a change >>>> in, say, >>>> x86, breaks arm, aarch64, ppc64, s390x would be useful for >>>> everyone. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Stuart >>>> >>>> >>>> On 15/01/17 13:07, Martijn Verburg wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> The LJC has plans to do this with a small build farm for >>>> some of the >>>> more common platforms. This will be for R&D and >>>> academic research >>>> purposes only. >>>> >>>> If you have OpenJDK / Jenkins build experience and would >>>> like to help >>>> then please let me know! >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Martijn >>>> >>>> On 13 January 2017 at 20:50, dalibor topic >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 12.01.2017 20:51, Martin Buchholz wrote: >>>> >>>> Oracle runs tests on many platforms; why does >>>> this report only >>>> include >>>> one platform? >>>> >>>> >>>> It would be rather nice to see more people run the >>>> OpenJDK jtreg >>>> tests on their own OpenJDK builds on platforms of >>>> their choice and >>>> post the results regularly. >>>> >>>> The great thing about these tests is that it >>>> doesn't have to be >>>> someone at Oracle doing all the running and all >>>> the posting. >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> dalibor topic >>>> -- >>>> Dalibor Topic | Principal >>>> Product Manager >>>> Phone: +494089091214 >>>> >>> >>>> > | Mobile: +491737185961 >>>> >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | >>>> 22761 Hamburg >>>> >>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG >>>> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen >>>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 >>>> >>>> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. >>>> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, >>>> Niederlande >>>> Handelsregister der Handelskammer >>>> Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 >>>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan >>>> Schultheiss, Val Maher >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >> Oracle is committed >>>> to developing >>>> practices and products that help protect the >>>> environment >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager >>> Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 >>> >>> >>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg >>> >>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG >>> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen >>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 >>> >>> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. >>> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande >>> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 >>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher >>> >>> Oracle is committed to developing >>> practices and products that help protect the environment >> -- Rgds,Rory O'Donnell Quality Engineering Manager Oracle EMEA, Dublin,Ireland From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Thu Nov 23 09:23:02 2017 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 10:23:02 +0100 Subject: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available In-Reply-To: References: <36e8ae68-e1df-498a-a946-09625885d288@default> <6110c2df-16b0-d321-84a0-cc3803ba3421@oracle.com> <8623bf50-8765-8751-1f6b-770a2cdfddf1@oracle.com> Message-ID: On 22.11.2017 21:44, Martijn Verburg wrote: > Hi Dalibor, > > That's a really good idea.? Any objections to having an automated system > sign up to this mailing list and posting on a regular schedule? No objections from me, as long as it is configured to send mail for tagged builds (as Oracle does for early access builds on Oracle Linux), rather than on each commit, or some other more frequent schedule. I.e. once a week is fine, as it allows and encourages comparison between different builds & platforms, multiple times per day is probably too noisy. Rory? cheers, dalibor topic > > Cheers, > Martijn > > On 22 November 2017 at 13:35, dalibor topic > wrote: > > Thanks, Martijn - the relevant link for the test results is at > https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/OpenJDK%20tests/ > . > > It'd be nice if someone from LJC or IBM would post a link/summary of > the test results regularly to this list as well. > > cheers, > dalibor topic > > On 21.11.2017 22:01, Martijn Verburg wrote: > > To complete this old thread, > > We now have a build farm at https://ci.adoptpenjdk.net with a > corresponding website at https://www.adoptopenjdk.net and all of > the supporting repos at https://www.github.com/adoptopenjdk > > > If you'd like to join the community Slack or GitHub and get a > walkthrough, please let me know! > > Cheers, > Martijn > > On 19 January 2017 at 22:12, Martijn Verburg > > >> wrote: > > ? ? Hi all, > > ? ? I'm partly on holiday this week but will get back to all of > you with > ? ? the straw man we had come up with a few FOSDEM's ago on how > we could > ? ? tackle this > > ? ? Cheers, > ? ? Martijn > > ? ? On 17 January 2017 at 21:49, Jonathan Gibbons > ? ? > >> > ? ? wrote: > > ? ? ? ? If someone can collect the different sets of jtreg output, > ? ? ? ? there's a related utility called "jtdiff" that can be > used to > ? ? ? ? generate combined reports.? It can compare either full work > ? ? ? ? directories, or the report/text/summary.txt files. The > latter > ? ? ? ? may be sufficient in this case. > > ? ? ? ? -- Jon > > > > ? ? ? ? On 1/16/17 3:54 AM, Stuart Monteith wrote: > > ? ? ? ? ? ? Hello, > ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? I'm Stuart Monteith in Linaro, working on > OpenJDK > ? ? ? ? ? ? on ARM's 64-bit > ? ? ? ? ? ? Aarch64 platform. We currently publish aarch64 testing > ? ? ? ? ? ? results to the > ? ? ? ? ? ? aarch64-port-dev mailing list and host results on > http://openjdk.linaro.org/ . What I would find useful would > ? ? ? ? ? ? be a means > ? ? ? ? ? ? to collate results across all the platforms, with > perhaps a > ? ? ? ? ? ? method to > ? ? ? ? ? ? collate results from separate build farms. I'm sure > a common > ? ? ? ? ? ? set formats > ? ? ? ? ? ? for presentation could be agreed upon. Knowing that > a change > ? ? ? ? ? ? in, say, > ? ? ? ? ? ? x86, breaks arm, aarch64, ppc64, s390x would be > useful for > ? ? ? ? ? ? everyone. > > ? ? ? ? ? ? Best regards, > ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? Stuart > > > ? ? ? ? ? ? On 15/01/17 13:07, Martijn Verburg wrote: > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Hi all, > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? The LJC has plans to do this with a small build > farm for > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? some of the > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? more common platforms.? This will be for R&D and > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? academic research > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? purposes only. > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? If you have OpenJDK / Jenkins build experience > and would > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? like to help > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? then please let me know! > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Cheers, > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Martijn > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? On 13 January 2017 at 20:50, dalibor topic > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >>> wrote: > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?On 12.01.2017 20:51, Martin Buchholz wrote: > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ?Oracle runs tests on many platforms; > why does > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? this report only > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ?include > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ?one platform? > > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?It would be rather nice to see more > people run the > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? OpenJDK jtreg > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?tests on their own OpenJDK builds on > platforms of > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? their choice and > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?post the results regularly. > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?The great thing about these tests is that it > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? doesn't have to be > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?someone at Oracle doing all the running > and all > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? the posting. > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?cheers, > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?dalibor topic > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?-- > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? Dalibor Topic | > Principal > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Product Manager > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?Phone: +494089091214 > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?> | Mobile: > +491737185961 > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | > K?hneh?fe 5 | > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 22761 Hamburg > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA > 95603 > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland > Verwaltung B.V. > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, > Niederlande > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?Handelsregister der Handelskammer > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Schultheiss, Val Maher > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >>> Oracle is committed > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? to developing > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?practices and products that help protect the > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? environment > > > > > > > -- > Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager > Phone: +494089091214 > | Mobile: +491737185961 > > > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG > Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen > Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 > > Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. > Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande > Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher > > > Oracle is committed to developing > practices and products that help protect the environment > > -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From rory.odonnell at oracle.com Thu Nov 23 09:25:57 2017 From: rory.odonnell at oracle.com (Rory O'Donnell) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:25:57 +0000 Subject: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available In-Reply-To: References: <36e8ae68-e1df-498a-a946-09625885d288@default> <6110c2df-16b0-d321-84a0-cc3803ba3421@oracle.com> <8623bf50-8765-8751-1f6b-770a2cdfddf1@oracle.com> Message-ID: <56c51e4b-4b80-fae7-cd7f-d5ade7b3dc69@oracle.com> On 23/11/2017 09:23, dalibor topic wrote: > > > On 22.11.2017 21:44, Martijn Verburg wrote: >> Hi Dalibor, >> >> That's a really good idea.? Any objections to having an automated >> system sign up to this mailing list and posting on a regular schedule? > > No objections from me, as long as it is configured to send mail for > tagged builds (as Oracle does for early access builds on Oracle > Linux), rather than on each commit, or some other more frequent > schedule. I.e. once a week is fine, as it allows and encourages > comparison between different builds & platforms, multiple times per > day is probably too noisy. > > Rory? Agreed, once a week seems like a good interval . Rgds,Rory > > cheers, > dalibor topic > >> >> Cheers, >> Martijn >> >> On 22 November 2017 at 13:35, dalibor topic > > wrote: >> >> ??? Thanks, Martijn - the relevant link for the test results is at >> ??? https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/OpenJDK%20tests/ >> ??? . >> >> ??? It'd be nice if someone from LJC or IBM would post a link/summary of >> ??? the test results regularly to this list as well. >> >> ??? cheers, >> ??? dalibor topic >> >> ??? On 21.11.2017 22:01, Martijn Verburg wrote: >> >> ??????? To complete this old thread, >> >> ??????? We now have a build farm at https://ci.adoptpenjdk.net with a >> ??????? corresponding website at https://www.adoptopenjdk.net and all of >> ??????? the supporting repos at https://www.github.com/adoptopenjdk >> ??????? >> >> ??????? If you'd like to join the community Slack or GitHub and get a >> ??????? walkthrough, please let me know! >> >> ??????? Cheers, >> ??????? Martijn >> >> ??????? On 19 January 2017 at 22:12, Martijn Verburg >> ??????? >> ??????? > ??????? >> wrote: >> >> ???????? ? ? Hi all, >> >> ???????? ? ? I'm partly on holiday this week but will get back to all of >> ??????? you with >> ???????? ? ? the straw man we had come up with a few FOSDEM's ago on how >> ??????? we could >> ???????? ? ? tackle this >> >> ???????? ? ? Cheers, >> ???????? ? ? Martijn >> >> ???????? ? ? On 17 January 2017 at 21:49, Jonathan Gibbons >> ???????? ? ? > ??????? >> ??????? > ??????? >> >> ???????? ? ? wrote: >> >> ???????? ? ? ? ? If someone can collect the different sets of jtreg >> output, >> ???????? ? ? ? ? there's a related utility called "jtdiff" that can be >> ??????? used to >> ???????? ? ? ? ? generate combined reports.? It can compare either >> full work >> ???????? ? ? ? ? directories, or the report/text/summary.txt files. The >> ??????? latter >> ???????? ? ? ? ? may be sufficient in this case. >> >> ???????? ? ? ? ? -- Jon >> >> >> >> ???????? ? ? ? ? On 1/16/17 3:54 AM, Stuart Monteith wrote: >> >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? Hello, >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? I'm Stuart Monteith in Linaro, working on >> ??????? OpenJDK >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? on ARM's 64-bit >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? Aarch64 platform. We currently publish aarch64 >> testing >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? results to the >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? aarch64-port-dev mailing list and host results on >> ??????? http://openjdk.linaro.org/ . What I would find useful would >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? be a means >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? to collate results across all the platforms, with >> ??????? perhaps a >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? method to >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? collate results from separate build farms. I'm sure >> ??????? a common >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? set formats >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? for presentation could be agreed upon. Knowing that >> ??????? a change >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? in, say, >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? x86, breaks arm, aarch64, ppc64, s390x would be >> ??????? useful for >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? everyone. >> >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? Best regards, >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? Stuart >> >> >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? On 15/01/17 13:07, Martijn Verburg wrote: >> >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Hi all, >> >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? The LJC has plans to do this with a small build >> ??????? farm for >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? some of the >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? more common platforms.? This will be for R&D >> and >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? academic research >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? purposes only. >> >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? If you have OpenJDK / Jenkins build experience >> ??????? and would >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? like to help >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? then please let me know! >> >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Cheers, >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Martijn >> >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? On 13 January 2017 at 20:50, dalibor topic >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ??????? >> ??????? > > >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ??????? >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ??????? >>> wrote: >> >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?On 12.01.2017 20:51, Martin Buchholz >> wrote: >> >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ?Oracle runs tests on many platforms; >> ??????? why does >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? this report only >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ?include >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ?one platform? >> >> >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?It would be rather nice to see more >> ??????? people run the >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? OpenJDK jtreg >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?tests on their own OpenJDK builds on >> ??????? platforms of >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? their choice and >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?post the results regularly. >> >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?The great thing about these tests is >> that it >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? doesn't have to be >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?someone at Oracle doing all the running >> ??????? and all >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? the posting. >> >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?cheers, >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?dalibor topic >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?-- >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? Dalibor Topic | >> ??????? Principal >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Product Manager >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?Phone: +494089091214 >> ??????? >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ??????? >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?> | Mobile: >> ??????? +491737185961 >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? >> ??????? >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > >> >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | >> ??????? K?hneh?fe 5 | >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 22761 Hamburg >> >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 >> M?nchen >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA >> ??????? 95603 >> >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland >> ??????? Verwaltung B.V. >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, >> ??????? Niederlande >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?Handelsregister der Handelskammer >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der >> Ven, Jan >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Schultheiss, Val Maher >> >> ?> ??????? >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ??????? > >> ?> ??????? >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ??????? >>> Oracle is committed >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? to developing >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?practices and products that help >> protect the >> ???????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? environment >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ??? -- ??? Dalibor Topic | Principal Product >> Manager >> ??? Phone: +494089091214 > ??? > | Mobile: +491737185961 >> ??? > >> >> ??? ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg >> >> ??? ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG >> ??? Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen >> ??? Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 >> >> ??? Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. >> ??? Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande >> ??? Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 >> ??? Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher >> >> ??? > ??? > Oracle is committed to >> developing >> ??? practices and products that help protect the environment >> >> > -- Rgds,Rory O'Donnell Quality Engineering Manager Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland From abdul.kolarkunnu at oracle.com Mon Nov 27 09:49:56 2017 From: abdul.kolarkunnu at oracle.com (Muneer Kolarkunnu) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 01:49:56 -0800 (PST) Subject: JDK 10 build 33 test results now available Message-ID: JDK 10 ea build 33 test results are now available at http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/10/testresults.html The jdk test results contain 9 differences from the build 32 test results. There are 3 testcase failures, these failures are under investigation. 0: /export/home/gtee/muneer/jtest/merge10/32/jdk/JTwork pass: 6,389; fail: 2; error: 1; not run: 2,277 1: /export/home/gtee/muneer/jtest/merge10/33/jdk/JTwork pass: 6,388; fail: 5; error: 1; not run: 2,280 0 1 Test pass fail com/sun/nio/sctp/SctpChannel/SocketOptionTests.java pass fail com/sun/nio/sctp/SctpMultiChannel/SocketOptionTests.java --- pass java/lang/Package/PackageVersionTest.java --- pass java/lang/invoke/InvokeMethodHandleWithBadArgument.java pass fail java/lang/management/MemoryMXBean/LowMemoryTest2.sh --- pass java/lang/management/RuntimeMXBean/ProcessIdTest.java --- pass javax/imageio/plugins/png/PngNegativeDimensionTest.java pass --- sun/pisces/DashStrokeTest.java pass --- sun/pisces/JoinMiterTest.java 9 differences The hotspot test results contain 5 differences from the build 32 test results. There are 2 testcase failures, these failures are under investigation, JBS issue already exists for these failures. 0: /export/home/gtee/muneer/jtest/merge10/32/hotspot/JTwork pass: 1,040; not run: 12,082 1: /export/home/gtee/muneer/jtest/merge10/33/hotspot/JTwork pass: 1,042; fail: 2; not run: 12,164 0 1 Test pass fail compiler/runtime/SpreadNullArg.java --- pass compiler/runtime/criticalnatives/argumentcorruption/CheckLongArgs.java --- pass compiler/runtime/criticalnatives/lookup/LookUp.java --- pass compiler/unsafe/TestSplitIf.java --- fail runtime/LoadClass/TestResize.java 5 differences The langtools test results contain 5 differences from the build 32 test results. No new testcase failures found. 0: /export/home/gtee/muneer/jtest/merge10/32/langtools/JTwork pass: 3,500; not run: 336 1: /export/home/gtee/muneer/jtest/merge10/33/langtools/JTwork pass: 3,505; not run: 337 0 1 Test --- pass tools/javac/generics/bridges/AnonymousSubtypeOfRawSupertype.java --- pass tools/javac/generics/bridges/VerifyNoBridgeLoopTest.java --- pass tools/javac/lambda/methodReferenceExecution/MethodReferenceIntersectionInducedTest.java --- pass tools/javac/lambda/methodReferenceExecution/MethodReferenceUnionTypeTest.java --- pass tools/javap/AnnoTest.java 5 differences The nashorn tests are not able to run because of a know issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8191771 -- Regards, Abdul Muneer Quality Engineer Oracle, Bangalore, India -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From abdul.kolarkunnu at oracle.com Mon Nov 27 09:54:48 2017 From: abdul.kolarkunnu at oracle.com (Muneer Kolarkunnu) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 01:54:48 -0800 (PST) Subject: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available In-Reply-To: References: <36e8ae68-e1df-498a-a946-09625885d288@default> <6110c2df-16b0-d321-84a0-cc3803ba3421@oracle.com> <8623bf50-8765-8751-1f6b-770a2cdfddf1@oracle.com> Message-ID: <6f0c6ca4-3cdd-4b31-86fa-d66aac349b13@default> Hi Volker, Thanks for the feedback. I updated the page 'howtoruntests' to conform to the latest consolidated repository. Regards, Muneer -----Original Message----- From: Volker Simonis [mailto:volker.simonis at gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 1:40 PM To: Martijn Verburg Cc: quality-discuss at openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available Hi Dalibor, could you please update: http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/10/docs/howtoruntests.html to conform to the latest, consolidated repository. The description still refers to the various sub-repos (jdk/test, hotspot/test, etc..) which are gone now. Thank you and best regards, Volker On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote: > Hi Dalibor, > > That's a really good idea. Any objections to having an automated > system sign up to this mailing list and posting on a regular schedule? > > Cheers, > Martijn > > On 22 November 2017 at 13:35, dalibor topic > wrote: >> >> Thanks, Martijn - the relevant link for the test results is at >> https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/OpenJDK%20tests/ . >> >> It'd be nice if someone from LJC or IBM would post a link/summary of >> the test results regularly to this list as well. >> >> cheers, >> dalibor topic >> >> On 21.11.2017 22:01, Martijn Verburg wrote: >>> >>> To complete this old thread, >>> >>> We now have a build farm at https://ci.adoptpenjdk.net with a >>> corresponding website at https://www.adoptopenjdk.net and all of the >>> supporting repos at https://www.github.com/adoptopenjdk >>> >>> If you'd like to join the community Slack or GitHub and get a >>> walkthrough, please let me know! >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Martijn >>> >>> On 19 January 2017 at 22:12, Martijn Verburg >>> > wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'm partly on holiday this week but will get back to all of you with >>> the straw man we had come up with a few FOSDEM's ago on how we could >>> tackle this >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Martijn >>> >>> On 17 January 2017 at 21:49, Jonathan Gibbons >>> > >>> wrote: >>> >>> If someone can collect the different sets of jtreg output, >>> there's a related utility called "jtdiff" that can be used to >>> generate combined reports. It can compare either full work >>> directories, or the report/text/summary.txt files. The latter >>> may be sufficient in this case. >>> >>> -- Jon >>> >>> >>> >>> On 1/16/17 3:54 AM, Stuart Monteith wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> I'm Stuart Monteith in Linaro, working on OpenJDK >>> on ARM's 64-bit >>> Aarch64 platform. We currently publish aarch64 testing >>> results to the >>> aarch64-port-dev mailing list and host results on >>> http://openjdk.linaro.org/ . What I would find useful would >>> be a means >>> to collate results across all the platforms, with perhaps a >>> method to >>> collate results from separate build farms. I'm sure a common >>> set formats >>> for presentation could be agreed upon. Knowing that a change >>> in, say, >>> x86, breaks arm, aarch64, ppc64, s390x would be useful for >>> everyone. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Stuart >>> >>> >>> On 15/01/17 13:07, Martijn Verburg wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> The LJC has plans to do this with a small build farm for >>> some of the >>> more common platforms. This will be for R&D and >>> academic research >>> purposes only. >>> >>> If you have OpenJDK / Jenkins build experience and would >>> like to help >>> then please let me know! >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Martijn >>> >>> On 13 January 2017 at 20:50, dalibor topic >>> >> >>> >> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 12.01.2017 20:51, Martin Buchholz wrote: >>> >>> Oracle runs tests on many platforms; why does >>> this report only >>> include >>> one platform? >>> >>> >>> It would be rather nice to see more people run the >>> OpenJDK jtreg >>> tests on their own OpenJDK builds on platforms of >>> their choice and >>> post the results regularly. >>> >>> The great thing about these tests is that it >>> doesn't have to be >>> someone at Oracle doing all the running and all >>> the posting. >>> >>> cheers, >>> dalibor topic >>> -- >>> Dalibor Topic | Principal >>> Product Manager >>> Phone: +494089091214 >>> >> >>> > | Mobile: +491737185961 >>> >>> >>> > >>> >>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | >>> 22761 Hamburg >>> >>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG >>> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen >>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA >>> 95603 >>> >>> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. >>> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, >>> Niederlande >>> Handelsregister der Handelskammer >>> Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 >>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan >>> Schultheiss, Val Maher >>> >>> >> >>> >> >> Oracle is committed >>> to developing >>> practices and products that help protect the >>> environment >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager >> Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 >> >> >> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg >> >> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG >> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen >> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 >> >> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. >> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister >> der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 >> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher >> >> Oracle is committed to developing >> practices and products that help protect the environment > > From abdul.kolarkunnu at oracle.com Wed Nov 29 13:09:15 2017 From: abdul.kolarkunnu at oracle.com (Muneer Kolarkunnu) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 05:09:15 -0800 (PST) Subject: JDK 10 Early Access b33 and JDK 8u162 Early Access b03 are available on jdk.java.net In-Reply-To: <8894ac47-b299-b5f8-d9ee-33b091141f7b@oracle.com> References: <8894ac47-b299-b5f8-d9ee-33b091141f7b@oracle.com> Message-ID: Hi All, JDK 10 Early Access? build 33 is available at : - jdk.java.net/10/ Notable changes since previous email. HYPERLINK "http://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8180019"JDK-8180019 - javadoc treats failure to access a URL as an error , not a warning. If javadoc cannot access the contents of a URL provided with the -link or -linkoffline options,the tool will now report an error. Previously, the tool continued with a warning, producing incorrect documentation output. HYPERLINK "http://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8175094"JDK-8175094 - The java.security.acl APIs are deprecated, for removal ?The deprecated java.security.acl APIs are now marked with forRemoval=true and are subject to removal in a future version of Java SE. ? HYPERLINK "http://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8175091"JDK-8175091 - The java.security.{Certificate,Identity,IdentityScope,Signer} APIs are deprecated, for removal The deprecated java.security.{Certificate, Identity, IdentityScope, Signer} classes are now marked with forRemoval=true and are subject to removal in a future version of Java SE. JDK 10 Schedule, Status & Features are available [1] Notes OpenJDK EA binaries will be available at a later date. Oracle has proposed: Newer version-string scheme for the Java SE Platform and the JDK Please see Mark Reinhold's proposal [2] JDK 8u162 Early Access build 03 is available at :- http://jdk.java.net/8/ Feedback - If you have suggestions or encounter bugs, please submit them using the usual Java SE bug-reporting channel. Be sure to include complete version information from the output of the java --version command. [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/10/ [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-dev/2017-November/000089.html -- Regards, Abdul Muneer Quality Engineer Oracle, Bangalore, India -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: