<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Jonathan Gibbons <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jonathan.gibbons@oracle.com" target="_blank">jonathan.gibbons@oracle.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On 09/16/2015 05:18 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Just now for the first time I ran all the jtreg tests in the "jdk_stable" test set using<br>
make test TEST=jdk_stable<br>
and I got around 50 failures out of 5000.<br>
Is that expected?<br>
<br>
Instead, I expect that with all the work on the test suite y'all have been doing, that the expected failure rate of something with a name like "jdk_stable" would be 0.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div></div>
Which forest? jdk9/dev? jigsaw/jake?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I saw this in both jdk9/jdk9 and jdk9/dev (but I wasn't trying to achieve a low-noise controlled environment)</div></div></div></div>