[riscv-port-jdk11u:riscv-port] RFR: 8314420: Initial patch of JDK11u riscv port

Fei Yang fyang at openjdk.org
Wed Aug 16 12:13:04 UTC 2023


On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 04:16:48 GMT, kuaiwei <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> It's the initial patch based on https://github.com/openjdk/jdk17u-dev/pull/1427 , and revert patches not required in JDK11u. The testing is running on a linux riscv board. There are some failed cases and we are working on fix them , the progress will updated.
> 
> Thanks the contribution of OpenJDK community and hard working of @zhengxiaolinX .
> 
> - [x]  slowdebug/fastdebug/release build
> - [x] Benchmark: SPECJbb2015, Renaissance
> - [ ]  Tier1 tests
> - [ ] Tier2 tests
> - [ ] Tier3 tests
> - [ ] Tier4 tests

> > Hi, we need to make sure it does not break other ports. So please fix the jcheck errors and then go to https://github.com/kuaiwei/riscv-port-jdk11u/actions and enable GHA workflows.
> 
> Hi, Thanks for the comment. I found you changed cross build config in #1 .May I cherry pick it or wait for its integration?

Looks like GHA for jdk11u-dev upstream are currently failing. I plan to do some merging for https://github.com/openjdk/riscv-port-jdk11u/pull/1 when the issue is fixed. I think https://github.com/openjdk/riscv-port-jdk11u/pull/1 should come after your current PR. So you should not depend on it. 

BTW: I think your current PR should be made a backport of [JDK-8276799](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8276799). So you should change the PR title into something like: "Backport 5905b02c0e2643ae8d097562f181953f6c88fc89". And let the bot do the rest.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/riscv-port-jdk11u/pull/3#issuecomment-1680486688


More information about the riscv-port-dev mailing list