<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;">Hello<div><br></div><div>In that case I would like to add a couple of RISC-V only performance fixes [1], [2].</div><div><br></div><div>Regards, Vladimir</div><div><br></div><div>[1] <a href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8296602">https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8296602</a></div><div>[2] <a href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8297359">https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8297359</a></div><div><br></div><div><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>7 марта 2023 г., в 06:22, yangfei@iscas.ac.cn написал(а):</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div><div>Hi,<br><br>I think we still have a couple of fixes to backport, as mentioned in the previous discussion [1] (5.1 patch for bugfix). <br>By referencing the 8u upstreaming of aarch64 port [2], I feel it's still possible to have some refectoring/performance fixes in the current riscv-port branch before upstreaming. <br>For example, support for RVC extension is still experimental in this branch as compared to product in jdk mainline. AFAIK, the current off-the-shelf RV64 chips/boards are all equipped with this extension. <br>But before we proceed, we will need the jdk-update project maintainer's confirmation about that. I see similar questions has been raised before [3]. <br><br>Regards,<br>Fei<br><br>[1] https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/riscv-port-dev/2023-February/000733.html<br>[2] https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2020-November/013121.html<br>[3] https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/riscv-port-dev/2023-February/000735.html<br><br>> -----Original Messages-----<br>> From: "Vladimir Kempik" <vladimir.kempik@gmail.com><br>> Sent Time: 2023-03-02 17:33:49 (Thursday)<br>> To: riscv-port-dev <riscv-port-dev@openjdk.org><br>> Cc: <br>> Subject: regarding 17u port<br>> <br>> Hello<br>> <br>> Now that the 17u backport in riscv-port-jdk17u is feeling well, what’s next?<br>> <br>> Should the riscv-port branch be frozen, so we have a minimalistic backport which is ready to start traveling to jdk17u-dev ?<br>> And the development ( more backports important for performance, etc) continues in a separate branch ?<br>> <br>> Regards, Vladimir<br></riscv-port-dev@openjdk.org></vladimir.kempik@gmail.com></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>