From volker.simonis at gmail.com  Tue Sep 20 15:37:59 2016
From: volker.simonis at gmail.com (Volker Simonis)
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 08:37:59 -0700
Subject: s390x-port-dev post from vaibhavv@us.ibm.com requires approval
In-Reply-To: <mailman.31904.1474366151.23828.s390x-port-dev@openjdk.java.net>
References: <mailman.31904.1474366151.23828.s390x-port-dev@openjdk.java.net>
Message-ID: <CA+3eh13HnpO2eGyCg-XV90Bqf9s3wup0++DyyRKcfhLEtrADRw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Vaibhav,

thanks a lot for your interest in the s390x port and sorry for the
inconvenience. We haven't updated the patch for some weeks and it may
be very well possible that it doesn't cleanly apply to the current
version any more. But this doesn't mean that we're not working on the
port internally.

@Goetz: can you please be so kind to upload a new version of our patch queue?

If your impatient, you could try to sync back the whole jdk9/hs forest
to the date when I uploaded the patch queue (around Aug 1st). That
should work as I've tested that version before uploading the patches.

That said, I'd like to kindly ask you to subscribe to the
s390x-port-dev mailing list at
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/s390x-port-dev,
otherwise you posts will not be accepted by the list.

Thank you and best regards,
Volker


On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:09 AM,  <s390x-port-dev-owner at openjdk.java.net> wrote:
> As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
> following mailing list posting:
>
>     List:    s390x-port-dev at openjdk.java.net
>     From:    vaibhavv at us.ibm.com
>     Subject: OpenJDK9 build issues for s390x
>     Reason:  Post by non-member to a members-only list
>
> At your convenience, visit:
>
>     http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/admindb/s390x-port-dev
>
> to approve or deny the request.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Vaibhav Vaingankar <vaibhavv at us.ibm.com>
> To: s390x-port-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Cc: Cindy Lee <cinderel at ca.ibm.com>, Amod Borkar <aborkar at us.ibm.com>
> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 15:38:55 +0530
> Subject: OpenJDK9 build issues for s390x
>
> Hello,
>
> We are trying to build openjdk for s390x. We did face issues while doing the same.
>
> Applying of patch failed
> After manually making the changes as per the patch build failed
>
>
> Following are the steps we followed to build openJDK
>
> 1. Clone openjdk hs branch
>
> hg clone http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs/
> cd hs
> sh ./get_sources.sh
>
> 2. Apply s390x patches
>
> - Download all s390x patches from here.
> - copy all the .patch files in hs/hotspot/.hg/patches folder
> - Run following command to apply the patch
>
> cd hs/hotspot
> hg qpush -a
>
> Note: The patch 9000017-add_defines_shared.patch fails to apply.
>
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 405
> 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/share/vm/utilities/macros.hpp.rej
> patch failed, rejects left in working dir
> errors during apply, please fix and refresh 9000017-add_defines_shared.patch
> We than made the changes manually in the file src/share/vm/utilities/macros.hpp as per the patch.
>
> 3. Next, we tried to build using the following commands:
>
> bash ./configure --disable-hotspot-gtest
> make all
>
> Build failed
>
> gmake[3]: *** No rule to make target `/home/test/hs/jdk/src/java.base/unix/conf/s390x/jvm.cfg', needed by `/home/test/hs/build/linux-s390x-normal-server-release/support/modules_libs/java.base/s390x/jvm.cfg'.  Stop.
> gmake[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> gmake[2]: *** [java.base-copy-jdk] Error 1
>
>
> Please let us know if we are missing anything here.
>
> Regards,
> Vaibhav
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: s390x-port-dev-request at openjdk.java.net
> To:
> Cc:
> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:09:11 +0000
> Subject: confirm 064fbee247ff69a4e6ba78ad753ee3f97d9cc317
> If you reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact,
> Mailman will discard the held message.  Do this if the message is
> spam.  If you reply to this message and include an Approved: header
> with the list password in it, the message will be approved for posting
> to the list.  The Approved: header can also appear in the first line
> of the body of the reply.

From Bertus.Bekker at bcx.co.za  Tue Sep 20 15:50:08 2016
From: Bertus.Bekker at bcx.co.za (Bertus Bekker - Business Connexion)
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 15:50:08 +0000
Subject: s390x-port-dev post from vaibhavv@us.ibm.com requires approval
In-Reply-To: <CA+3eh13HnpO2eGyCg-XV90Bqf9s3wup0++DyyRKcfhLEtrADRw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <mailman.31904.1474366151.23828.s390x-port-dev@openjdk.java.net>,
	<CA+3eh13HnpO2eGyCg-XV90Bqf9s3wup0++DyyRKcfhLEtrADRw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1474386609535.89273@bcx.co.za>

Thank you Volker and all
________________________________________
From: s390x-port-dev <s390x-port-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net> on behalf of Volker Simonis <volker.simonis at gmail.com>
Sent: 20 September 2016 17:37
To: s390x-port-dev at openjdk.java.net; vaibhavv at us.ibm.com; Lindenmaier, Goetz
Subject: Re: s390x-port-dev post from vaibhavv at us.ibm.com requires approval

Hi Vaibhav,

thanks a lot for your interest in the s390x port and sorry for the
inconvenience. We haven't updated the patch for some weeks and it may
be very well possible that it doesn't cleanly apply to the current
version any more. But this doesn't mean that we're not working on the
port internally.

@Goetz: can you please be so kind to upload a new version of our patch queue?

If your impatient, you could try to sync back the whole jdk9/hs forest
to the date when I uploaded the patch queue (around Aug 1st). That
should work as I've tested that version before uploading the patches.

That said, I'd like to kindly ask you to subscribe to the
s390x-port-dev mailing list at
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/s390x-port-dev,
otherwise you posts will not be accepted by the list.

Thank you and best regards,
Volker


On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:09 AM,  <s390x-port-dev-owner at openjdk.java.net> wrote:
> As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
> following mailing list posting:
>
>     List:    s390x-port-dev at openjdk.java.net
>     From:    vaibhavv at us.ibm.com
>     Subject: OpenJDK9 build issues for s390x
>     Reason:  Post by non-member to a members-only list
>
> At your convenience, visit:
>
>     http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/admindb/s390x-port-dev
>
> to approve or deny the request.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Vaibhav Vaingankar <vaibhavv at us.ibm.com>
> To: s390x-port-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Cc: Cindy Lee <cinderel at ca.ibm.com>, Amod Borkar <aborkar at us.ibm.com>
> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 15:38:55 +0530
> Subject: OpenJDK9 build issues for s390x
>
> Hello,
>
> We are trying to build openjdk for s390x. We did face issues while doing the same.
>
> Applying of patch failed
> After manually making the changes as per the patch build failed
>
>
> Following are the steps we followed to build openJDK
>
> 1. Clone openjdk hs branch
>
> hg clone http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs/
> cd hs
> sh ./get_sources.sh
>
> 2. Apply s390x patches
>
> - Download all s390x patches from here.
> - copy all the .patch files in hs/hotspot/.hg/patches folder
> - Run following command to apply the patch
>
> cd hs/hotspot
> hg qpush -a
>
> Note: The patch 9000017-add_defines_shared.patch fails to apply.
>
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 405
> 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/share/vm/utilities/macros.hpp.rej
> patch failed, rejects left in working dir
> errors during apply, please fix and refresh 9000017-add_defines_shared.patch
> We than made the changes manually in the file src/share/vm/utilities/macros.hpp as per the patch.
>
> 3. Next, we tried to build using the following commands:
>
> bash ./configure --disable-hotspot-gtest
> make all
>
> Build failed
>
> gmake[3]: *** No rule to make target `/home/test/hs/jdk/src/java.base/unix/conf/s390x/jvm.cfg', needed by `/home/test/hs/build/linux-s390x-normal-server-release/support/modules_libs/java.base/s390x/jvm.cfg'.  Stop.
> gmake[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> gmake[2]: *** [java.base-copy-jdk] Error 1
>
>
> Please let us know if we are missing anything here.
>
> Regards,
> Vaibhav
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: s390x-port-dev-request at openjdk.java.net
> To:
> Cc:
> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:09:11 +0000
> Subject: confirm 064fbee247ff69a4e6ba78ad753ee3f97d9cc317
> If you reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact,
> Mailman will discard the held message.  Do this if the message is
> spam.  If you reply to this message and include an Approved: header
> with the list password in it, the message will be approved for posting
> to the list.  The Approved: header can also appear in the first line
> of the body of the reply.




This email and its contents are subject to the Business Connexion (Pty) Ltd. Email legal notice: http://www.bcx.co.za/disclaimer.htm

From goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com  Wed Sep 21 13:48:02 2016
From: goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com (Lindenmaier, Goetz)
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 13:48:02 +0000
Subject: OpenJDK9 build issues for s390x
Message-ID: <653411ff99ff4939bdc3cc2dbe36d8f2@DEWDFE13DE50.global.corp.sap>

Hi,

I uploaded an updated patch queue to my own webrev space:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/s390x_patch_queue/

Vaibhav, you need to apply this to the hs-comp repository.

Best regards,
  Goetz.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Volker Simonis [mailto:volker.simonis at gmail.com]
> Sent: Dienstag, 20. September 2016 17:38
> To: s390x-port-dev at openjdk.java.net; vaibhavv at us.ibm.com; Lindenmaier,
> Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>
> Subject: Re: s390x-port-dev post from vaibhavv at us.ibm.com requires
> approval
> 
> Hi Vaibhav,
> 
> thanks a lot for your interest in the s390x port and sorry for the
> inconvenience. We haven't updated the patch for some weeks and it may
> be very well possible that it doesn't cleanly apply to the current
> version any more. But this doesn't mean that we're not working on the
> port internally.
> 
> @Goetz: can you please be so kind to upload a new version of our patch
> queue?
> 
> If your impatient, you could try to sync back the whole jdk9/hs forest
> to the date when I uploaded the patch queue (around Aug 1st). That
> should work as I've tested that version before uploading the patches.
> 
> That said, I'd like to kindly ask you to subscribe to the
> s390x-port-dev mailing list at
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/s390x-port-dev,
> otherwise you posts will not be accepted by the list.
> 
> Thank you and best regards,
> Volker
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:09 AM,  <s390x-port-dev-
> owner at openjdk.java.net> wrote:
> > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
> > following mailing list posting:
> >
> >     List:    s390x-port-dev at openjdk.java.net
> >     From:    vaibhavv at us.ibm.com
> >     Subject: OpenJDK9 build issues for s390x
> >     Reason:  Post by non-member to a members-only list
> >
> > At your convenience, visit:
> >
> >     http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/admindb/s390x-port-dev
> >
> > to approve or deny the request.
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Vaibhav Vaingankar <vaibhavv at us.ibm.com>
> > To: s390x-port-dev at openjdk.java.net
> > Cc: Cindy Lee <cinderel at ca.ibm.com>, Amod Borkar
> <aborkar at us.ibm.com>
> > Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 15:38:55 +0530
> > Subject: OpenJDK9 build issues for s390x
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > We are trying to build openjdk for s390x. We did face issues while doing the
> same.
> >
> > Applying of patch failed
> > After manually making the changes as per the patch build failed
> >
> >
> > Following are the steps we followed to build openJDK
> >
> > 1. Clone openjdk hs branch
> >
> > hg clone http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs/
> > cd hs
> > sh ./get_sources.sh
> >
> > 2. Apply s390x patches
> >
> > - Download all s390x patches from here.
> > - copy all the .patch files in hs/hotspot/.hg/patches folder
> > - Run following command to apply the patch
> >
> > cd hs/hotspot
> > hg qpush -a
> >
> > Note: The patch 9000017-add_defines_shared.patch fails to apply.
> >
> > Hunk #3 FAILED at 405
> > 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> src/share/vm/utilities/macros.hpp.rej
> > patch failed, rejects left in working dir
> > errors during apply, please fix and refresh 9000017-
> add_defines_shared.patch
> > We than made the changes manually in the file
> src/share/vm/utilities/macros.hpp as per the patch.
> >
> > 3. Next, we tried to build using the following commands:
> >
> > bash ./configure --disable-hotspot-gtest
> > make all
> >
> > Build failed
> >
> > gmake[3]: *** No rule to make target
> `/home/test/hs/jdk/src/java.base/unix/conf/s390x/jvm.cfg', needed by
> `/home/test/hs/build/linux-s390x-normal-server-
> release/support/modules_libs/java.base/s390x/jvm.cfg'.  Stop.
> > gmake[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> > gmake[2]: *** [java.base-copy-jdk] Error 1
> >
> >
> > Please let us know if we are missing anything here.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Vaibhav
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: s390x-port-dev-request at openjdk.java.net
> > To:
> > Cc:
> > Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:09:11 +0000
> > Subject: confirm 064fbee247ff69a4e6ba78ad753ee3f97d9cc317
> > If you reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact,
> > Mailman will discard the held message.  Do this if the message is
> > spam.  If you reply to this message and include an Approved: header
> > with the list password in it, the message will be approved for posting
> > to the list.  The Approved: header can also appear in the first line
> > of the body of the reply.

From volker.simonis at gmail.com  Wed Sep 21 14:11:13 2016
From: volker.simonis at gmail.com (Volker Simonis)
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 16:11:13 +0200
Subject: OpenJDK9 build issues for s390x
In-Reply-To: <653411ff99ff4939bdc3cc2dbe36d8f2@DEWDFE13DE50.global.corp.sap>
References: <653411ff99ff4939bdc3cc2dbe36d8f2@DEWDFE13DE50.global.corp.sap>
Message-ID: <CA+3eh11PCePJ8s=nY46Rc5dAi7XQi5qEh8UL7-iaKsHzxnfWhw@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks Goetz!

Am Mittwoch, 21. September 2016 schrieb Lindenmaier, Goetz :

> Hi,
>
> I uploaded an updated patch queue to my own webrev space:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/s390x_patch_queue/
>
> Vaibhav, you need to apply this to the hs-comp repository.
>
> Best regards,
>   Goetz.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Volker Simonis [mailto:volker.simonis at gmail.com <javascript:;>]
> > Sent: Dienstag, 20. September 2016 17:38
> > To: s390x-port-dev at openjdk.java.net <javascript:;>; vaibhavv at us.ibm.com
> <javascript:;>; Lindenmaier,
> > Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com <javascript:;>>
> > Subject: Re: s390x-port-dev post from vaibhavv at us.ibm.com <javascript:;>
> requires
> > approval
> >
> > Hi Vaibhav,
> >
> > thanks a lot for your interest in the s390x port and sorry for the
> > inconvenience. We haven't updated the patch for some weeks and it may
> > be very well possible that it doesn't cleanly apply to the current
> > version any more. But this doesn't mean that we're not working on the
> > port internally.
> >
> > @Goetz: can you please be so kind to upload a new version of our patch
> > queue?
> >
> > If your impatient, you could try to sync back the whole jdk9/hs forest
> > to the date when I uploaded the patch queue (around Aug 1st). That
> > should work as I've tested that version before uploading the patches.
> >
> > That said, I'd like to kindly ask you to subscribe to the
> > s390x-port-dev mailing list at
> > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/s390x-port-dev,
> > otherwise you posts will not be accepted by the list.
> >
> > Thank you and best regards,
> > Volker
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:09 AM,  <s390x-port-dev-
> > owner at openjdk.java.net <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
> > > following mailing list posting:
> > >
> > >     List:    s390x-port-dev at openjdk.java.net <javascript:;>
> > >     From:    vaibhavv at us.ibm.com <javascript:;>
> > >     Subject: OpenJDK9 build issues for s390x
> > >     Reason:  Post by non-member to a members-only list
> > >
> > > At your convenience, visit:
> > >
> > >     http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/admindb/s390x-port-dev
> > >
> > > to approve or deny the request.
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > From: Vaibhav Vaingankar <vaibhavv at us.ibm.com <javascript:;>>
> > > To: s390x-port-dev at openjdk.java.net <javascript:;>
> > > Cc: Cindy Lee <cinderel at ca.ibm.com <javascript:;>>, Amod Borkar
> > <aborkar at us.ibm.com <javascript:;>>
> > > Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 15:38:55 +0530
> > > Subject: OpenJDK9 build issues for s390x
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > We are trying to build openjdk for s390x. We did face issues while
> doing the
> > same.
> > >
> > > Applying of patch failed
> > > After manually making the changes as per the patch build failed
> > >
> > >
> > > Following are the steps we followed to build openJDK
> > >
> > > 1. Clone openjdk hs branch
> > >
> > > hg clone http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs/
> > > cd hs
> > > sh ./get_sources.sh
> > >
> > > 2. Apply s390x patches
> > >
> > > - Download all s390x patches from here.
> > > - copy all the .patch files in hs/hotspot/.hg/patches folder
> > > - Run following command to apply the patch
> > >
> > > cd hs/hotspot
> > > hg qpush -a
> > >
> > > Note: The patch 9000017-add_defines_shared.patch fails to apply.
> > >
> > > Hunk #3 FAILED at 405
> > > 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> > src/share/vm/utilities/macros.hpp.rej
> > > patch failed, rejects left in working dir
> > > errors during apply, please fix and refresh 9000017-
> > add_defines_shared.patch
> > > We than made the changes manually in the file
> > src/share/vm/utilities/macros.hpp as per the patch.
> > >
> > > 3. Next, we tried to build using the following commands:
> > >
> > > bash ./configure --disable-hotspot-gtest
> > > make all
> > >
> > > Build failed
> > >
> > > gmake[3]: *** No rule to make target
> > `/home/test/hs/jdk/src/java.base/unix/conf/s390x/jvm.cfg', needed by
> > `/home/test/hs/build/linux-s390x-normal-server-
> > release/support/modules_libs/java.base/s390x/jvm.cfg'.  Stop.
> > > gmake[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> > > gmake[2]: *** [java.base-copy-jdk] Error 1
> > >
> > >
> > > Please let us know if we are missing anything here.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Vaibhav
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > From: s390x-port-dev-request at openjdk.java.net <javascript:;>
> > > To:
> > > Cc:
> > > Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:09:11 +0000
> > > Subject: confirm 064fbee247ff69a4e6ba78ad753ee3f97d9cc317
> > > If you reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact,
> > > Mailman will discard the held message.  Do this if the message is
> > > spam.  If you reply to this message and include an Approved: header
> > > with the list password in it, the message will be approved for posting
> > > to the list.  The Approved: header can also appear in the first line
> > > of the body of the reply.
>

From volker.simonis at gmail.com  Tue Sep 27 17:49:18 2016
From: volker.simonis at gmail.com (Volker Simonis)
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 19:49:18 +0200
Subject: RFR: JEP draft for Linux/s3990x port
Message-ID: <CA+3eh11Y8kP6AQ6tBsuggOx=dGHt6dyS08dmn09AcFSa1X8q3A@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

can you please review and endorse the following draft JEP for the
integration of the Linux/s390x port into the jkd9 master repository:

https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166730

As detailed in the JEP, the Linux/s390x requires very few shared
changes and we therefore don't foresee any impact on the existing
platforms at all. Following you can find a short description of the
planned changes:

hotspot:
=======

Out for review:
8166560: [s390] Basic enablement of s390 port.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/8166560-basic_s390/hotspot.wr01/

Reviewed:
8166562: C2: Suppress relocations in scratch emit.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/8166562-scratch_emit/webrev.01/

Will send RFR soon (depends on 8166560):
8166561: [s390] Adaptions needed for s390 port in C1 and C2.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/8166562-scratch_emit/webrev.01

We are still investigating the need of these shared changes:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/s390x_patch_queue/hotspot/9000011-pass_PC_to_retAddrOffset.patch
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/s390x_patch_queue/hotspot/9000016-constant_table_offset.patch

And finally the patch with the s390x-only platform files. We are still
editing these to get them into OpenJdk style and shape.
Hotspot passes most jck, jtreg and spec tests with these.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/s390x_patch_queue/hotspot/9000101-zFiles.patch

top-level repository:
===============

The following is just adding some s390x specific compiler flags to flags.m4
8166800: [s390] Top-level build changes required for Linux/s390x
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166800

jdk repository:
============

This one just adds a new jvm.cfg file for s390x
8166801: [s390] Add jvm.cfg file for Linux/s390x
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166801


And finally we plan to do one more change which fixes the jtreg test
on Linux/s390x. But this is mainly for the correct detection of the
platform and for excluding the tests which are not appropriate for
s390x.

Thank you and best regards,
Volker

From vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com  Tue Sep 27 18:15:11 2016
From: vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com (Vladimir Kozlov)
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 11:15:11 -0700
Subject: RFR: JEP draft for Linux/s3990x port
In-Reply-To: <CA+3eh11Y8kP6AQ6tBsuggOx=dGHt6dyS08dmn09AcFSa1X8q3A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+3eh11Y8kP6AQ6tBsuggOx=dGHt6dyS08dmn09AcFSa1X8q3A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <72ddbd25-c7df-b02a-3827-d431f286c795@oracle.com>

On 9/27/16 10:49 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can you please review and endorse the following draft JEP for the
> integration of the Linux/s390x port into the jkd9 master repository:
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166730

Good.
Add links to webrevs in a comment. It will help to get umbrella FC 
extension approval.

>
> As detailed in the JEP, the Linux/s390x requires very few shared
> changes and we therefore don't foresee any impact on the existing
> platforms at all. Following you can find a short description of the
> planned changes:
>
> hotspot:
> =======
>
> Out for review:
> 8166560: [s390] Basic enablement of s390 port.
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/8166560-basic_s390/hotspot.wr01/
>
> Reviewed:
> 8166562: C2: Suppress relocations in scratch emit.
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/8166562-scratch_emit/webrev.01/
>
> Will send RFR soon (depends on 8166560):
> 8166561: [s390] Adaptions needed for s390 port in C1 and C2.
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/8166562-scratch_emit/webrev.01

Wrong link.

Thanks,
Vladimir

>
> We are still investigating the need of these shared changes:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/s390x_patch_queue/hotspot/9000011-pass_PC_to_retAddrOffset.patch
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/s390x_patch_queue/hotspot/9000016-constant_table_offset.patch
>
> And finally the patch with the s390x-only platform files. We are still
> editing these to get them into OpenJdk style and shape.
> Hotspot passes most jck, jtreg and spec tests with these.
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/s390x_patch_queue/hotspot/9000101-zFiles.patch
>
> top-level repository:
> ===============
>
> The following is just adding some s390x specific compiler flags to flags.m4
> 8166800: [s390] Top-level build changes required for Linux/s390x
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166800
>
> jdk repository:
> ============
>
> This one just adds a new jvm.cfg file for s390x
> 8166801: [s390] Add jvm.cfg file for Linux/s390x
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166801
>
>
> And finally we plan to do one more change which fixes the jtreg test
> on Linux/s390x. But this is mainly for the correct detection of the
> platform and for excluding the tests which are not appropriate for
> s390x.
>
> Thank you and best regards,
> Volker
>

From volker.simonis at gmail.com  Thu Sep 29 16:55:21 2016
From: volker.simonis at gmail.com (Volker Simonis)
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 18:55:21 +0200
Subject: RFR: JEP draft for Linux/s3990x port
In-Reply-To: <72ddbd25-c7df-b02a-3827-d431f286c795@oracle.com>
References: <CA+3eh11Y8kP6AQ6tBsuggOx=dGHt6dyS08dmn09AcFSa1X8q3A@mail.gmail.com>
	<72ddbd25-c7df-b02a-3827-d431f286c795@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <CA+3eh10XP=-P-=jarS_RJWgLa+WkC+gWEAV8GYsUh4cWCbZNxA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Vladimir,

thanks a lot for reviewing and endorsing the JEP.

I've linked all the relevant issues to the JEP  (they all have a link
to a webrev) and change the state to "Submitted".

There's just one more small shared change we need for the port for
which we haven't opened a bug now because we are still working on
simplifying it. The current version looks as follows:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2016/s390x/9000016-constant_table_offset.patch

What are the next steps? Should I add a "jdk9-fc-request" label to t
he JEP and add a corresponding "FC Extension Request" comment to it?
Or will this be done automatically once I move it to "Candidate"?

Is there anything left to do before I can move it to "Candidate" state?

Thanks a lot and best regards,
Volker




On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Vladimir Kozlov
<vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
> On 9/27/16 10:49 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> can you please review and endorse the following draft JEP for the
>> integration of the Linux/s390x port into the jkd9 master repository:
>>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166730
>
>
> Good.
> Add links to webrevs in a comment. It will help to get umbrella FC extension
> approval.
>
>>
>> As detailed in the JEP, the Linux/s390x requires very few shared
>> changes and we therefore don't foresee any impact on the existing
>> platforms at all. Following you can find a short description of the
>> planned changes:
>>
>> hotspot:
>> =======
>>
>> Out for review:
>> 8166560: [s390] Basic enablement of s390 port.
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/8166560-basic_s390/hotspot.wr01/
>>
>> Reviewed:
>> 8166562: C2: Suppress relocations in scratch emit.
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/8166562-scratch_emit/webrev.01/
>>
>> Will send RFR soon (depends on 8166560):
>> 8166561: [s390] Adaptions needed for s390 port in C1 and C2.
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/8166562-scratch_emit/webrev.01
>
>
> Wrong link.
>
> Thanks,
> Vladimir
>
>
>>
>> We are still investigating the need of these shared changes:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/s390x_patch_queue/hotspot/9000011-pass_PC_to_retAddrOffset.patch
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/s390x_patch_queue/hotspot/9000016-constant_table_offset.patch
>>
>> And finally the patch with the s390x-only platform files. We are still
>> editing these to get them into OpenJdk style and shape.
>> Hotspot passes most jck, jtreg and spec tests with these.
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/s390x_patch_queue/hotspot/9000101-zFiles.patch
>>
>> top-level repository:
>> ===============
>>
>> The following is just adding some s390x specific compiler flags to
>> flags.m4
>> 8166800: [s390] Top-level build changes required for Linux/s390x
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166800
>>
>> jdk repository:
>> ============
>>
>> This one just adds a new jvm.cfg file for s390x
>> 8166801: [s390] Add jvm.cfg file for Linux/s390x
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166801
>>
>>
>> And finally we plan to do one more change which fixes the jtreg test
>> on Linux/s390x. But this is mainly for the correct detection of the
>> platform and for excluding the tests which are not appropriate for
>> s390x.
>>
>> Thank you and best regards,
>> Volker
>>
>

From vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com  Thu Sep 29 18:25:29 2016
From: vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com (Vladimir Kozlov)
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 11:25:29 -0700
Subject: RFR: JEP draft for Linux/s3990x port
In-Reply-To: <CA+3eh10XP=-P-=jarS_RJWgLa+WkC+gWEAV8GYsUh4cWCbZNxA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+3eh11Y8kP6AQ6tBsuggOx=dGHt6dyS08dmn09AcFSa1X8q3A@mail.gmail.com>
	<72ddbd25-c7df-b02a-3827-d431f286c795@oracle.com>
	<CA+3eh10XP=-P-=jarS_RJWgLa+WkC+gWEAV8GYsUh4cWCbZNxA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6261447a-fc39-4ea6-2ccf-3f0dcc396a36@oracle.com>

You need to wait when Mark (OpenJDK Lead) move it to Candidate (or 
other) state:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html

Vladimir

On 9/29/16 9:55 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> thanks a lot for reviewing and endorsing the JEP.
>
> I've linked all the relevant issues to the JEP  (they all have a link
> to a webrev) and change the state to "Submitted".
>
> There's just one more small shared change we need for the port for
> which we haven't opened a bug now because we are still working on
> simplifying it. The current version looks as follows:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2016/s390x/9000016-constant_table_offset.patch
>
> What are the next steps? Should I add a "jdk9-fc-request" label to t
> he JEP and add a corresponding "FC Extension Request" comment to it?
> Or will this be done automatically once I move it to "Candidate"?
>
> Is there anything left to do before I can move it to "Candidate" state?
>
> Thanks a lot and best regards,
> Volker
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Vladimir Kozlov
> <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
>> On 9/27/16 10:49 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> can you please review and endorse the following draft JEP for the
>>> integration of the Linux/s390x port into the jkd9 master repository:
>>>
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166730
>>
>>
>> Good.
>> Add links to webrevs in a comment. It will help to get umbrella FC extension
>> approval.
>>
>>>
>>> As detailed in the JEP, the Linux/s390x requires very few shared
>>> changes and we therefore don't foresee any impact on the existing
>>> platforms at all. Following you can find a short description of the
>>> planned changes:
>>>
>>> hotspot:
>>> =======
>>>
>>> Out for review:
>>> 8166560: [s390] Basic enablement of s390 port.
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/8166560-basic_s390/hotspot.wr01/
>>>
>>> Reviewed:
>>> 8166562: C2: Suppress relocations in scratch emit.
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/8166562-scratch_emit/webrev.01/
>>>
>>> Will send RFR soon (depends on 8166560):
>>> 8166561: [s390] Adaptions needed for s390 port in C1 and C2.
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/8166562-scratch_emit/webrev.01
>>
>>
>> Wrong link.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vladimir
>>
>>
>>>
>>> We are still investigating the need of these shared changes:
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/s390x_patch_queue/hotspot/9000011-pass_PC_to_retAddrOffset.patch
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/s390x_patch_queue/hotspot/9000016-constant_table_offset.patch
>>>
>>> And finally the patch with the s390x-only platform files. We are still
>>> editing these to get them into OpenJdk style and shape.
>>> Hotspot passes most jck, jtreg and spec tests with these.
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/s390x_patch_queue/hotspot/9000101-zFiles.patch
>>>
>>> top-level repository:
>>> ===============
>>>
>>> The following is just adding some s390x specific compiler flags to
>>> flags.m4
>>> 8166800: [s390] Top-level build changes required for Linux/s390x
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166800
>>>
>>> jdk repository:
>>> ============
>>>
>>> This one just adds a new jvm.cfg file for s390x
>>> 8166801: [s390] Add jvm.cfg file for Linux/s390x
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166801
>>>
>>>
>>> And finally we plan to do one more change which fixes the jtreg test
>>> on Linux/s390x. But this is mainly for the correct detection of the
>>> platform and for excluding the tests which are not appropriate for
>>> s390x.
>>>
>>> Thank you and best regards,
>>> Volker
>>>
>>