OpenJDK9 build issues for s390x

[Lindenmaier, Goetz]

Hi,

I uploaded an updated patch queue to my own webrev space:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/s390x_patch_queue/

Vaibhav, you need to apply this to the hs-comp repository.

Best regards,
  Goetz.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Volker Simonis [mailto:volker.simonis at gmail.com]
> Sent: Dienstag, 20. September 2016 17:38
> To: s390x-port-dev at openjdk.java.net; vaibhavv at us.ibm.com; Lindenmaier,
> Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>
> Subject: Re: s390x-port-dev post from vaibhavv at us.ibm.com requires
> approval
> 
> Hi Vaibhav,
> 
> thanks a lot for your interest in the s390x port and sorry for the
> inconvenience. We haven't updated the patch for some weeks and it may
> be very well possible that it doesn't cleanly apply to the current
> version any more. But this doesn't mean that we're not working on the
> port internally.
> 
> @Goetz: can you please be so kind to upload a new version of our patch
> queue?
> 
> If your impatient, you could try to sync back the whole jdk9/hs forest
> to the date when I uploaded the patch queue (around Aug 1st). That
> should work as I've tested that version before uploading the patches.
> 
> That said, I'd like to kindly ask you to subscribe to the
> s390x-port-dev mailing list at
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/s390x-port-dev,
> otherwise you posts will not be accepted by the list.
> 
> Thank you and best regards,
> Volker
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:09 AM,  <s390x-port-dev-
> owner at openjdk.java.net> wrote:
> > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
> > following mailing list posting:
> >
> >     List:    s390x-port-dev at openjdk.java.net
> >     From:    vaibhavv at us.ibm.com
> >     Subject: OpenJDK9 build issues for s390x
> >     Reason:  Post by non-member to a members-only list
> >
> > At your convenience, visit:
> >
> >     http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/admindb/s390x-port-dev
> >
> > to approve or deny the request.
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Vaibhav Vaingankar <vaibhavv at us.ibm.com>
> > To: s390x-port-dev at openjdk.java.net
> > Cc: Cindy Lee <cinderel at ca.ibm.com>, Amod Borkar
> <aborkar at us.ibm.com>
> > Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 15:38:55 +0530
> > Subject: OpenJDK9 build issues for s390x
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > We are trying to build openjdk for s390x. We did face issues while doing the
> same.
> >
> > Applying of patch failed
> > After manually making the changes as per the patch build failed
> >
> >
> > Following are the steps we followed to build openJDK
> >
> > 1. Clone openjdk hs branch
> >
> > hg clone http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs/
> > cd hs
> > sh ./get_sources.sh
> >
> > 2. Apply s390x patches
> >
> > - Download all s390x patches from here.
> > - copy all the .patch files in hs/hotspot/.hg/patches folder
> > - Run following command to apply the patch
> >
> > cd hs/hotspot
> > hg qpush -a
> >
> > Note: The patch 9000017-add_defines_shared.patch fails to apply.
> >
> > Hunk #3 FAILED at 405
> > 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> src/share/vm/utilities/macros.hpp.rej
> > patch failed, rejects left in working dir
> > errors during apply, please fix and refresh 9000017-
> add_defines_shared.patch
> > We than made the changes manually in the file
> src/share/vm/utilities/macros.hpp as per the patch.
> >
> > 3. Next, we tried to build using the following commands:
> >
> > bash ./configure --disable-hotspot-gtest
> > make all
> >
> > Build failed
> >
> > gmake[3]: *** No rule to make target
> `/home/test/hs/jdk/src/java.base/unix/conf/s390x/jvm.cfg', needed by
> `/home/test/hs/build/linux-s390x-normal-server-
> release/support/modules_libs/java.base/s390x/jvm.cfg'.  Stop.
> > gmake[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> > gmake[2]: *** [java.base-copy-jdk] Error 1
> >
> >
> > Please let us know if we are missing anything here.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Vaibhav
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: s390x-port-dev-request at openjdk.java.net
> > To:
> > Cc:
> > Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:09:11 +0000
> > Subject: confirm 064fbee247ff69a4e6ba78ad753ee3f97d9cc317
> > If you reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact,
> > Mailman will discard the held message.  Do this if the message is
> > spam.  If you reply to this message and include an Approved: header
> > with the list password in it, the message will be approved for posting
> > to the list.  The Approved: header can also appear in the first line
> > of the body of the reply.