<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Ok, looks good.<br>
Thanks,<br>
Valerie<br>
<br>
On 8/25/2015 1:10 PM, Rajan Halade wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:55DCCBA9.2090105@oracle.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
Hi Valerie,<br>
<br>
Thanks for comments! I have fixed all of them.<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Erhalade/8048601/webrev.01/">http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rhalade/8048601/webrev.01/</a><br>
<br>
- Rajan<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/20/15 4:19 PM, Valerie Peng
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:55D66095.4090309@oracle.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
Rajan,<br>
<br>
Here are some comments for the other half of the webrev:<br>
TestCipherTextLength.java<br>
1) line 82 and 85, why TEXT_LEN is needed? I don't find any
usage of it inside runAll(..) method?<br>
</blockquote>
removed.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:55D66095.4090309@oracle.com" type="cite"> 2)
the names here are a bit too similar, e.g. PBEWrapper,
PBECipherWrapper, AESPBEWrapper. The individual subclasses
aren't that big, why not make them inner static classes of the
parent class? No need to repeat the Wrapper and PBE in the
subclass names. To match your other wrapper class
DESCipherWrapper, perhaps you can rename the PBE counterpart to
something like:<br>
<br>
PBECipherWrapper (parent) with subclasses (defined
statically inside PBECipherWrapper) named PBKDF2, AES, and
Legacy (these are PKCS#5 v1.5 defined algorithms).<br>
</blockquote>
fixed, thanks!<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:55D66095.4090309@oracle.com" type="cite"> <br>
PBKDF2Wrapper.java<br>
1) typo on line 43 and 52 - should be T<u>R</u>ANSFORMATION<br>
</blockquote>
fixed<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:55D66095.4090309@oracle.com" type="cite"> 2)
Instead of "PKDF2_DEFAULT_KEY_LEN" (typo? I think u meant
PBKDF2), it should really be CIPHER_KEY_SIZE since the purpose
here is to generate keys for the Cipher object. <br>
</blockquote>
renamed the variable.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:55D66095.4090309@oracle.com" type="cite"> 3)
the key that you generated on line 57 can be viewed as an
intermediate key. You could have moved the processing in
initCipher(...) method into the constructor and store the
resulting cipher key into 'key'. For example:<br>
SecretKey derivedKey =
keyFactory.generateSecret(pbeKeySpec);<br>
key = new SecretKeySpec(derivedKey.getEncoded(),
KEY_ALGORITHM);<br>
</blockquote>
key is generated in consturctor.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:55D66095.4090309@oracle.com" type="cite"> <br>
Thanks,<br>
Valerie<br>
<br>
On 8/19/2015 3:38 PM, Valerie Peng wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:55D50580.8090402@oracle.com" type="cite">Rajan,
<br>
<br>
TestCipher.java <br>
1) this class is used as the base for many algorithm, modes,
and paddings. But then it hardcodes some values or parameter
types which may not work against some algorithms, e.g.
IvParameterSpec with 8-byte value, padding length being 8
bytes. PAD_LEN=8 vs PAD_BYTES=16, is this difference
intentional? <br>
Seems to me that this TestCipher class only works against
Ciphers w/ 8-byte blocks and uses iv. I think it's clearer to
have a constant named BLKSIZE instead of just 8. <br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
Yes. I have changed iv to be final variable now initialized in
constructor.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:55D66095.4090309@oracle.com" type="cite">
<blockquote cite="mid:55D50580.8090402@oracle.com" type="cite">
2) Also, u don't need to repeatedly generate random bytes for
input data, IV, etc. The input data can be generated once
outside of loop. As for the parameters, either u can just let
the cipher object generates it or grab the IV values from
whatever data that u have already, e.g. certain part of the
input data. <br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
fixed, no need for random anymore.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:55D66095.4090309@oracle.com" type="cite">
<blockquote cite="mid:55D50580.8090402@oracle.com" type="cite">
2) input length is always 800. Would be nice to have a comment
stating the requirement, e.g. multiple of blocks in order to
work against ciphers w/ NoPadding <br>
3) line 54, Would be nice to clarify that the range of tested
key size is from MINIMUM_KEY_SIZE to what returned by
Cipher.getMaxAllowedKeyLength(ALGORITHM) with the increment of
KEYCUTTER. <br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
added comments.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:55D66095.4090309@oracle.com" type="cite">
<blockquote cite="mid:55D50580.8090402@oracle.com" type="cite">
4) line 66, keyStrength is better phrased as variousKeySize in
my opinion. <br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
renamed to variousKeySize.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:55D66095.4090309@oracle.com" type="cite">
<blockquote cite="mid:55D50580.8090402@oracle.com" type="cite">
5) MINIMUM_KEY_SIZE and KEYCUTTER should be algorithm
specific. It'd be clearer to explicitly list out the
algorithms which works against the the hardcoded values for
the sake of maintenance. <br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
added comments.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:55D66095.4090309@oracle.com" type="cite">
<blockquote cite="mid:55D50580.8090402@oracle.com" type="cite">
6) It looks to me that String[] modes and String[] paddings
could be moved to runAll(). This seems more consistent with
the signature of runTest() where mode and padding are again
specified here. <br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
I left it as is and changed runTest to private method. Either is
ok with me. <br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Rajan<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:55D66095.4090309@oracle.com" type="cite">
<blockquote cite="mid:55D50580.8090402@oracle.com" type="cite">
<br>
Will send u comments regarding the TestLength ones in a
separate email. <br>
Thanks, <br>
Valerie <br>
<br>
On 7/14/2015 1:27 PM, Rajan Halade wrote: <br>
<blockquote type="cite">May I request you to review new tests
added to check Cipher operations with different algorithms
and modes. <br>
<br>
Webrev: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Erhalade/8048601/webrev.00/">http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rhalade/8048601/webrev.00/</a>
<br>
Bug: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8048601">https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8048601</a>
<br>
<br>
Thanks, <br>
Rajan <br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>